[TLS] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8446 (6135)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 21 March 2024 03:20 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD5EC151538; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.958
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.958 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2Pn1tV21a4s; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ADDC151092; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 4198C5BEC3F; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
To: research@bensmyth.com, ekr@rtfm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: paul.wouters@aiven.io, iesg@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240321032006.4198C5BEC3F@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 20:20:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6bcEnlqEMYp9e1syW26QdZiKXxg>
Subject: [TLS] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8446 (6135)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 03:20:07 -0000
The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC8446, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6135 -------------------------------------- Status: Held for Document Update Type: Editorial Reported by: Ben Smyth <research@bensmyth.com> Date Reported: 2020-04-28 Held by: Paul Wouters (IESG) Section: Global Original Text ------------- list, series, set, and vector are seemingly used as synonyms. Corrected Text -------------- Using list, series, set, xor vector would help at least one reader. Notes ----- Additionally, consistent usage is desirable, e.g., page 31 uses "A list of extensions" whereas "A set of extensions" is used on page 60. Elsewhere inconsistently usage causes confusion, e.g., Page 48: client_shares: A list of offered KeyShareEntry values in descending order of client preference. This vector MAY be empty if the client is requesting a (Replace "vector" with "list", or vice versa.) Paul Wouters (AD): This got incorporated into the bis document, but not exactly as suggested. -------------------------------------- RFC8446 (draft-ietf-tls-tls13-28) -------------------------------------- Title : The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 Publication Date : August 2018 Author(s) : E. Rescorla Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [TLS] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8446 (… RFC Errata System