IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Draft RHRD

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 01 November 2017 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F9D13F717 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBGkqz8bTY61 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2D913B13E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 08:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA1Evkjo001738; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:03:49 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=WfuQjonxRlLY3NHO053xc1HG9w2wLjls9XLc/RNAjOA=; b=B645Ir+ey906+xDJFphSgK9Jy4XvV5iBjIH1u765tmQsCQCTzY3F1HXYiAzaeGamo1/D khbCrnlUqJ9QbyFMDeUhHBtjQcdScsdUeK93xTptlt2HwjNBQfFOymOF+f+ySNlxV9pA EvtTPLSeTlJ+1R0jc3ykFaeC0ROWWZYlvIj3VGFKebhYkDrdgdJDWinVD3KllIRhuUmP YvjaA31WE8p3gbIS15wmHAu769xXOdaBGF/RbCwkz+v/AjW7+mJLdA+KdDp7+9FH82lj 3tLbo2/coBfE7xGWBgYNiCOBTc4IqbXljC+ANlKbd7MNadOSVHyBx+dpOI7fIw0ywFFB 7g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2dvmw2pdyh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:03:48 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA1F1Ntv005353; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:03:46 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2dvn7u3pva-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:03:46 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:03:46 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:03:46 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
CC: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] Draft RHRD
Thread-Index: AQHTUyDtk5mAfD7MmEOXeSzZheIE1qL/4gaA
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:03:45 +0000
Message-ID: <287A1689-6DE4-4D2E-BD67-8B8A36ECF741@akamai.com>
References: <C2DD7992-0A5A-4970-8DDB-DBA651B4D6D7@akamai.com> <2161E083-EB01-4D04-9E9F-2E763E9EC06D@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <2161E083-EB01-4D04-9E9F-2E763E9EC06D@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.35.44]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_287A16896DE44D2EBD678B8A36ECF741akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-11-01_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1711010209
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-11-01_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1711010208
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ALcW8r3FasE3Yqdn9U3PVTHm9AY>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Draft RHRD
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 15:03:57 -0000

  *   Indeed, anyone can implement the approach in draft-green, which has no opt-in capability.  In Prague, we heard that a lot of people would be more comfortable with an opt-in capability, so we specified an extension that does so.

I get it.  And in retrospect, I am convinced that was a bad decision.  Like the quote from the movie _Animal House_ about trust. ☺

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email