IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] draft-kato-tls-rfc4132bis-03

Satoru Kanno <kanno-s@po.ntts.co.jp> Wed, 11 March 2009 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <kanno-s@po.ntts.co.jp>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E632E3A69BF for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CvGtNOU2xLxM for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ics.ntts.co.jp (mail2.ics.ntts.co.jp [202.32.24.42]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D553A681D for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sadoku34.silk.ntts.co.jp (sadoku34 [10.7.18.34]) by mail2.ics.ntts.co.jp (8.13.8/NTTSOFT) with ESMTP id n2B3ALVZ025799; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by sadoku34.silk.ntts.co.jp (8.13.8/NTTSOFT) id n2B3ALRb022986; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: from ccm19.silk.ntts.co.jp [10.7.18.19] by sadoku34.silk.ntts.co.jp with SMTP id NAA22985; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0900
Received: from mail16.silk.ntts.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccm19.silk.ntts.co.jp (8.14.3/NTTSOFT) with ESMTP id n2B3ALCF004802; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: from mail16.silk.ntts.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail16.silk.ntts.co.jp (8.14.3/NTTSOFT) with ESMTP id n2B3ALjj005670; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.7.206.148]) by mail16.silk.ntts.co.jp (8.14.3/NTTSOFT) with ESMTP id n2B3AHtS005639; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:21 +0900 (JST)
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:10:18 +0900
From: Satoru Kanno <kanno-s@po.ntts.co.jp>
To: Nelson B Bolyard <nelson@bolyard.me>
In-Reply-To: <49A7207D.20606@bolyard.me>
References: <20090227005322.336D.KANNO-S@po.ntts.co.jp> <49A7207D.20606@bolyard.me>
X-Face: ,\m{?h\)X
Message-Id: <20090311120843.EE93.KANNO-S@po.ntts.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.21.02 [ja]
X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: CC-Mail-V4-Client
X-CC-Mail-RelayStamp: CC-Mail-V4-Server
Cc: tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-kato-tls-rfc4132bis-03
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 03:09:53 -0000

On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:06:37 -0800
Nelson B Bolyard <nelson@bolyard.me> wrote:

> Satoru Kanno wrote, On 2009-02-26 08:19:
> > Hi, List
> > 
> > We've uploaded an updated 'Camellia Cipher Suites for TLS',
> > and is available at
> > 
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kato-tls-rfc4132bis-03.txt
> > 
> > Please check our document.
> > 
> > Of course, comments and questions about our document would be welcome.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > --
> > Satoru Kanno
> 
> Please provide a brief summary of the differences between this document
> and RFC 4132.  Since RFC 4132 is implemented in recent versions of
> Firefox, I am interested in knowing if the new document necessitates
> any changes that might present interoperability issues with implementations
> of that RFC.
> 
> Regards,
> /Nelson Bolyard

Hi Nelson,

The differences between this draft and RFC 4132 are addition of
Camellia ciphersuites for TLSv1.2.

New ciphersuites of this document are as follows:

  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_128_CBC_SHA256

  CipherSuite TLS_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256
  CipherSuite TLS_DH_anon_WITH_CAMELLIA_256_CBC_SHA256

Best regards,

--
Satoru Kanno

Security Business Unit
Mobile and Security Solution Business Group
NTT Software Corporation

e-mail: kanno-s@po.ntts.co.jp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email