IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: PQC Continuity draft (DANE chain déjà vu)

Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> Thu, 05 February 2026 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B14B28868B for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:55:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tu-dresden.de
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9F8ih-FasTZB for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:55:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.75]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59D1B288683 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:55:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tu-dresden.de; s=dkim2022; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JnkP1yNwHsSsdsECnj8ow6Xuq5lLkcmWdNUACBHya74=; b=NcXt7NZA8oLORsdp4apOGVCv37 fmRGg9lQ6y3P8Zo4+h9VDKS2ERMoADzhfnAnzDtKYaxfa0AmE12Sh4fHyng51D3IMJSlZ8VbfRY90 S8wKt4Y9V1dJUk2XXnVrIeo02/5B43KFYVHyfYqffbNotiZfIOjY3cz/g7cEGZKTfq7UHbZoEFoZk x5UT0tCdPUFn0LFqLneYKI0Sh8vjpyOG0us2fv45ZTWOggZxObHTC2Rne4Nsm47x2T7CncsJxQlZh /Lpo4SRG1D2E9aXDmW0QurvteRNWxwr7aSsjN9IkWJBoCCXMyR+Sax5vIdjkz0mIycEA+2khbYKPT ihVVmKMw==;
Received: from msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de ([172.26.35.139] helo=msx.tu-dresden.de) by mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>) id 1vo7Jl-0080AH-V6 for tls@ietf.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2026 22:55:18 +0100
Received: from [10.12.5.228] (141.76.13.149) by msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.35; Thu, 5 Feb 2026 22:55:16 +0100
Message-ID: <be310cc4-2f3f-4225-b243-9a551ac67415@tu-dresden.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 22:55:15 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <FRWP195MB2764043A4C7B03B8145A455FA99DA@FRWP195MB2764.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <DM6PR18MB28597D58553B966E9418660FAB9AA@DM6PR18MB2859.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> <aYMVBj6RYjx6e0ut@chardros.imrryr.org> <FRWP195MB276444AA2B3B306586EACA37A999A@FRWP195MB2764.EURP195.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <571cc431-0acf-0f1c-d1ba-fbd69127179f@nohats.ca> <b2fdcb69-f192-4067-98dc-edeaecf42df6@tu-dresden.de> <aYUGD5KTUcto39gq@chardros.imrryr.org>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>
In-Reply-To: <aYUGD5KTUcto39gq@chardros.imrryr.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-512"; boundary="------------ms060203080605050505090104"
X-ClientProxiedBy: msx-t421.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.138) To msx-t422.msx.ad.zih.tu-dresden.de (172.26.35.139)
X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout4.zih.tu-dresden.de
Message-ID-Hash: KMJL773OT5LI22TW7OVNOTYMSRF4PGTK
X-Message-ID-Hash: KMJL773OT5LI22TW7OVNOTYMSRF4PGTK
X-MailFrom: muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: PQC Continuity draft (DANE chain déjà vu)
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/FsXChwA_G8LR5PaNhyj9JT9WTI8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Please stop attacking the respectable members of the WG.

I haven't done any formal analysis for DANE or PQ. So I am neither 
interested in the history nor the details.

If your concern is about DANE, I want precise answer to two questions 
posted a couple of times since December 16 [0,1,2]:

Did you reach out to the researchers who did DANE-related formal 
analysis? What did they say?

The first one is pretty binary. Why are you not giving a yes/no answer 
to it?

Thanks for staying on point.

-Usama

[0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VfgJ5ExuYXvEiSGlNJ0X8L1jGHI/

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dance/GIPVxwb4SnnN4I4K-xY0QLK0EzQ/

[2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/c6ZR2fkfqZlGxGiKPmlA1dWo_uw/

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status