[TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6347 (4104)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 08 September 2014 18:45 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3851A02EE for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -108.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-108.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6CMHH99PDR1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917BD1A02C2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4113B180015; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: ekr@rtfm.com, nagendra@cs.stanford.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, turners@ieca.com, jsalowey@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 6000:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140908184459.4113B180015@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:44:59 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/GEohpqG08F2afa8JhSCQVHnMLvk
Cc: mpg@polarssl.org, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6347 (4104)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:45:09 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6347, "Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6347&eid=4104 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg@polarssl.org> Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- [Page 8] In order to ensure that any given sequence/epoch pair is unique, implementations MUST NOT allow the same epoch value to be reused within two times the TCP maximum segment lifetime. In practice, TLS implementations rarely rehandshake; therefore, we do not expect this to be a problem. Corrected Text -------------- [Delete these two sentences.] Notes ----- Page 9 starts with: "Similarly, implementations MUST NOT allow the epoch to wrap" which is a stronger requirement (not allowing to wrap at all vs not allowing reuse within some period), so the weaker requirement should be eliminated to avoid confusion. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6347 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2 Publication Date : January 2012 Author(s) : E. Rescorla, N. Modadugu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6347 (4104) RFC Errata System