Re: [TLS] 2nd consensus call: draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 02:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBB23A085B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 19:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbW-0t05P1ba for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 19:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3732B3A085A for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 19:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id h6so4024300lfc.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kxGTgiJ3etV5Uf8b/1vzQVco5cjbDPF+YBoK+eFPejU=; b=YpXf8f7V5NORYC9pNk/dLppbDFEZRW8qZl6Tutsb28qjWGu1n4PMaAdQfYuVL40A8e EmIT22K6W/OdZe+Wd9Jxd0pLlSu82y1Ff6zsjx3gweIGRdzFDb1xMYW5S2/mFAP43/DR SsSihUKD2DuzsrrhwZoBl7uctPmY0ZDfH+wVTLkN210iN8b3KAFs5HaxCeBIzgEcu1uV 6ILamR2F9GHcQfSuZ4sfbF9GhuydZUv5JCNkpR3tD0NCI2HAJm7FQIa61IurQt/WPIcO X4pr9EZJ0fcFKs86EFDtFhYt794IO1bzN5FEy9n3wLR3+LgClURZRJLiIKDxBeap+Br1 FqQg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kxGTgiJ3etV5Uf8b/1vzQVco5cjbDPF+YBoK+eFPejU=; b=mRBzmR//AxrYmeNFp4Wy8Vv+7525n7ELdg6GlyNQ+mnS4ZSg5LdUdSyKvvmtaU+F7W lHxO+686jzgwLq/SczKOMqBbZEC9bS6rTOqEsj7PIQHNh6uUYYp68BeAwT1d17I6wmVu sNVuvfSs5bqu7lbslUkXcVpXGvDxxBaQrs9YCNsu/i6PfJSU4lw6cdXP/8LZPEibdrCP ijcZGowPpbKPfBTSp5Ps1B+KrGxvuyHQVoVUWOgf0lWZ4s2htl7GqBxOZl3PJsa6JK11 4tC+T7PfZr6i/7WOfb3jU8GLQsepWhO42nj5gG8rLANRKydrYLLhOwErJpDhWBAXFDWc HMLQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pubub5rlQtmXnLikmwdGvDSqN28MMg4c6suAchkpEp1ltpfD9rvx VridWOxg/34ep0p3MhDJtomeLqIdG4JMOfdHZiRfoIHO8uc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKw8V/VZ5mC5kdp4miJL6CSIzGo1Da5LiIiePlLh91lIboQQUbprspXIuiKMrmzS3qBHCGL7g1MLQaKUOlsH58=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:9141:: with SMTP id y1mr3099958lfj.168.1586314445317; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E1FD6C4D-467C-48CF-A8C6-3A0DE1ED8ADC@sn3rd.com> <09bc4592-314f-4fe0-8b49-f18c367bed35@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <09bc4592-314f-4fe0-8b49-f18c367bed35@www.fastmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 19:53:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBNb3Sv8ax2ox2aDXB9ijdx46fpGxkL4iC4oiFrgsZJC4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003fca705a2be9d50"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/HRks7PkdaN-ZI6P88Sx-VbLotYo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] 2nd consensus call: draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequests
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 02:54:09 -0000

I also made a number of comments, but I think it's roughly fine.

-Ekr


On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:08 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:

> I made a few comments on the pull request, but they are minor.  Let's do
> this.
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020, at 03:07, Sean Turner wrote:
> > hi TLS WG,
> >
> > During the consensus call to determine whether ticket reuse use cases
> > should be supported we did not see consensus to add that text, but we
> > did seem some potential emerging consensus to add a second field to the
> > extension; technically, it is to rename count->new_session_count and
> > add a new counter called resumption_count [0]. If you oppose this
> > change, please indicate on list by 2359 UTC 14 April 2020 and please
> > state why.
> >
> > Joe and Sean
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest/pull/19
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>