Re: [TLS] questions regarding draft-ietf-tls-rfc2246-bis-13.txt

jimmy <jimmyb@huawei.com> writes:

> Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> jimmy <jimmyb@huawei.com> writes:
>>
>
>>> I too had pointed this out in an earlier mail, but got no replies. It
>>> seems in a previous thread in this list Eric had replied to someone
>>> posing a similar query. He had actually mentioned data had lower
>>> precedence (similar to what's in tls1.0 & the earlier tls1.1_drafts.
>>>
>>> So, it's a bit confusing. tls1.1 is in the rfc editor queue, so is
>>> that why no clarifications are coming in (are these going to be
>>> addressed in tls 1.2?)
>> This will be clarified in TLS 1.1 "Authors 48 hours"
>> -Ekr
>>
>
> thankyou Eric, but which one will it be. does it mean application data
> gets higher precedence?

There should be no change from the 2246 language.

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls