IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04: (with COMMENT)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2017 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3427127866; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dyqT6G3-c4vV; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FC01120727; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id h4so58659240lfj.3; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eQ0qEItdqOv8FuAmHewQEbT0mBiJpfySIN3tQFVPJDI=; b=k9oy4ZN4LaK7gWOqeXzMwYFP7fv3lzrhjytq3N2ezhbQUmEPulwKX2k9nLKtSxPrQu CrYK8imLd/YW1stKey94R3hWzvRLCxX2oEEA6lbzltZ6CURRzzLJb9sHD1PtyyMQcvXU 6zX7UrIuBcuTujxXOt0ARcFOX8difsaghfVHNp3KJ/ZVfXMgghUxlt5AFd41uuYhoaZf uizXDOQxv9v1fJOuaNrfxN69vCfLOBFWoSbf72rY/X21+AXkjBcwb3sGyAzOwcPkKmd/ yS1oEWTWDa51X+KRL9wFFhiBIr02F3sYeg7oNHP4FMAgGhqG9mXoNW69CLaHgWRTgm1y oQbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eQ0qEItdqOv8FuAmHewQEbT0mBiJpfySIN3tQFVPJDI=; b=EMwnsOZv3QI9InDrpwkLqbtrizirYXjLpTLYY3yDdGOsEVQZLVCV9p+RaCbI5E0eig 0LUGIXaH0AU7VYz1w/u+ST8sIe1lj1IlhchTEaVZd6hcicVuoC9lUHcE+TZzOtRZf2A3 78oovYkAwXhPkih+q/GPWmmaREW+TmrCs5dASYl54tJ/zLcFgez+BFJRCYNQfYCKQMq9 u9YHbAmAuFIGuSVtod/8uy2i+nrgxgA/l9F/u0QLJxa4ZzSqtcSDbD4dcsWwOTiXpw7S Qga+8PgSiC3neRL375EPMVg5SaiZWE9Xna5t7tTKqAQMWTFgQJwSPYFFHCbdOX8bX4cE 0Zdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDi0TbVUbrLmu+ZY2A8kZcG6CLFAe4Sm9/o5DeJj0FdvdBCCqno 0KR/IumxDEzNj1VE64xXuZk5WJcHHQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.215.198 with SMTP id q67mr7625292lfi.76.1495584659525; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.46.22.73 with HTTP; Tue, 23 May 2017 17:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkngnUCNOrTJTd7Se+8seghnfE3DXBTbj1s3mw4Nt09Yjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <149556730804.28545.6150805815075208815.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170523193453.CF9761A6A6@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp> <CADZyTkngnUCNOrTJTd7Se+8seghnfE3DXBTbj1s3mw4Nt09Yjg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 10:10:58 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVg=ex5nP6qexprE=jU49nOgPSZj41yeXuZMVo9H9zXSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Cc: "mrex@sap.com" <mrex@sap.com>, tls-chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead@ietf.org, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tls <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Jct6tpo_vEgaRxIR6zQAw_AKxwU>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 00:11:03 -0000

On 24 May 2017 at 08:04, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> wrote:
> So I have propose a fall back to the latest version. However, if we agree
> this is a better approach, I am fine adding it to the document.


Not sure what you mean by this.  If you mean removing the offending
paragraph, that seems best.

It's OK for these suites to be 1.2 only.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email