Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop?

Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> Mon, 12 September 2016 23:35 UTC

Return-Path: <noloader@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2364212B12C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2G_3Hr4N3hg for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29D7A12B04E for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id y2so344472904oie.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=zWbDVctMzklrOXvbvmQUF6Uxw+D4GAaIQVrdhH2QT0c=; b=wGrunmXh+0/NUckBYCwvXLd8XerN9flnpQWIYsLcrT4I4Ec1/WUoY/Qf+Acp0jbAHD zJVV7T/iyKwATWf/2pYobCiR8f7iFz+qZlZWaMiK/yUNDa49MIqxGJ86qd0nntjfLCiC VPpSB6TNQG4b6Xaxf9Tx6h1BBdw6k+f4n8S4o8Lux1Aq/nRc0HVi1DcOty5fJeDxtlvj FMhHINwF2Uf32HXVQ5A3hz4HA8EZSZslw3/sPdlboU+ktP6Y3P7DoJ5bmzRIMGZixFqS kLTCd9V7qY2r2vdWK0lG2y8EmTUyF3K7ZWWy/Iikme7PXqZlxEkYksQf8rC2e9ioo19P DaMQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zWbDVctMzklrOXvbvmQUF6Uxw+D4GAaIQVrdhH2QT0c=; b=hrBIjGN8rsLufKKgVMrWrRncMuWQuESbrGUJaydXeCq6emMLG3AREFNQzsDUSALUR4 aPlnnLgyCyqRdd8HLHI45OJ4BkoI2MvSSzzmTAY1KZ7s1OLgtsDF1KxWNCZLdPX78SXP 0ExwtR07ECGKuqvLfQOtVO10JpYLh0enTiZ/v+4oeZCleta/zNZ0PvqC8ivq4QvlfdKd ejFnCULdy6ZBw7dIvr3fySouhOOa5cvse4YiBvuBhlvhOASwxNxwL884xGKcsW/PuQ2c WimfpLRH9Hk1Phyragc0J6SYXULOSd32Q0IKfYz7Fw8Q7NnrLqNCjHgNz/nDqA0LZSme vJPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNqnLkIaULyxaGJuzytnhyRdIZyvT7/3dfYpt0EcOtkXquqM+XTjSbXoL3Va9FFuPzvh63/cUNFQMueAQ==
X-Received: by 10.202.102.140 with SMTP id m12mr2428051oik.24.1473723347470; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.131.70 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 16:35:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ffd74054d64047cd9dfebc6e9fd6bc19@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <ffd74054d64047cd9dfebc6e9fd6bc19@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 19:35:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8nqiV-YKr7URdRozhtoWpDgCPhDgoPjE99iZw5Ct1Om+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Lv754Ncz_KENFhvrevV5428Ooow>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] chacha/poly interop?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: noloader@gmail.com
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 23:35:51 -0000

On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> OpenSSL just landed our chacha/poly implementation into master.  We pass the
> RFC test vectors, looking for other implementations to test against.

Sorry to dig up an old thread....

I tested against Bernstein/ECRYPT ChaCha and test vectors from
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-strombergson-chacha-test-vectors.
TLS-ChaCha does not inter-operate with ChaCha.

The name should probably be disambiguated somehow.

Jeff