[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 12 November 2023 07:38 UTC

Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============9193532202760600109=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20231112073849.38296C16F3EE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:38:49 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NyXHmz7MEbzQ60noYAbVHhJ7cUU>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
Precedence: list



Issues
------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+2/-8/💬7)
  2 issues created:
  - s11.1 item 2: include "TLS 1.3" column values (by seanturner)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/585 
  - IANA Considerations: DTLS-Only values (by seanturner)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/583 

  6 issues received 7 new comments:
  - #567 Are mandatory ECH extensions deployable? (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/567 
  - #450 Grease HRR acceptance signal? (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/450 [parked] 
  - #441 Reconsider non-HRR ECH acceptance signal (2 by chris-wood, ekr)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/441 [design] [parked] 
  - #427 Extensibility (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/427 [design] [parked] 
  - #401 ECH complexity (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/401 [pre-wglc] 
  - #264 Handshake-level vs record-level padding (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/264 [design] [parked] 

  8 issues closed:
  - IANA Considerations: DTLS-Only values https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/583 
  - Extensibility https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/427 [design] [parked] 
  - Are mandatory ECH extensions deployable? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/567 
  - Grease HRR acceptance signal? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/450 [parked] 
  - Reconsider non-HRR ECH acceptance signal https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/441 [design] [parked] 
  - Handshake-level vs record-level padding https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/264 [design] [parked] 
  - ECH complexity https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/401 [pre-wglc] 
  - Are we quite right now with "MUST use public_name"? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/572 

* tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-2/💬0)
  1 issues created:
  - Say even more clearly that you can't trust the client to send their most preferred shares (by ekr)
    https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1330 

  2 issues closed:
  - Figure 7.1 is phat https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1326 
  - kramdown warnings https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1327 



Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+3/-4/💬12)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - DTLS-Only Column Value (by seanturner)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/584 
  - Update draft-ietf-tls-esni.md (by grittygrease)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/582 
  - Minor editorial fixes before more substantial ones. (by taddhar)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/581 

  4 pull requests received 12 new comments:
  - #581 Minor editorial fixes before more substantial ones. (3 by chris-wood, taddhar)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/581 
  - #575 Relax requirements around the outer SNI value (7 by chris-wood, ckcr4lyf, ekr)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/575 
  - #457 Define the Padding message (1 by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/457 
  - #313 Replace record-level padding with handshake-level padding (1 by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/313 

  4 pull requests merged:
  - DTLS-Only Column Value
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/584 
  - Update draft-ietf-tls-esni.md
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/582 
  - Minor editorial fixes before more substantial ones.
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/581 
  - Relax requirements around the outer SNI value
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/575 

* tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-2/💬1)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Clarify how to negotiate groups if you want to respect the client order. (by ekr)
    https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1331 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #1331 Clarify how to negotiate groups if you want to respect the client order. (1 by ekr)
    https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1331 

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Use aasvg for pictures
    https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1328 
  - md fixes
    https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1329 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls
* https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team

[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Dra… Repository Activity Summary Bot