Re: [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-41

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Sat, 27 February 2021 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631883A14BC; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:33:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V32koaDScL5W; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:33:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B143A14BB; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 11RLXT0Q003885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 16:33:33 -0500
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:33:29 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tls-dtls13.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20210227213329.GL21@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <161346491395.1040.558625384530161173@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <161346491395.1040.558625384530161173@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/RrHq55WPPPwDVqBSiATvM7xpacg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-41
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 21:33:40 -0000

Hi Dan,

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:41:53AM -0800, Dan Romascanu via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-tls-dtls13-51
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 2021-02-16
> IETF LC End Date: 2021-02-22
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: Ready
> 
> This document updates RFC6347 (DTLS 1.2) with version 1.3 of the protocol. It's
> a clear, well structured and mature document, justifying the time and number of
> successive iterations spent in writing it.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Is really [RFC6347] which this document OBSOLETEs only an Informative Reference?

Thanks for the review!

I don't really understand this comment, though -- the only other choice is
to be a normative reference, but we couldn't make a normative reference to
an obsolete document.  Was there something in particular that you thought
required 6437 to be a normative reference?

Thanks,

Ben