[TLS] TLSv1.2 connection renegotiation to TLSv1.3
Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> Thu, 01 September 2016 16:08 UTC
Return-Path: <hkario@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B52612D1D2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQ6pQAfm_4hB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B8A12D0FC for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD0D4E4E5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 16:07:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pintsize.usersys.redhat.com (dhcp-0-191.brq.redhat.com [10.34.0.191]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u81G7uKF020638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:07:57 -0400
From: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 18:07:50 +0200
Message-ID: <4152939.QfPvxGhp5y@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.6.7-300.fc24.x86_64; KDE/5.25.0; x86_64; ; )
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4664947.PDm2GODNzS"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.27
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.38]); Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:07:57 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Rs8UJ_oWjOLkl4Z3HKds4h0hpY4>
Subject: [TLS] TLSv1.2 connection renegotiation to TLSv1.3
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 16:08:04 -0000
I didn't notice in the -15 draft anything explicitly prohibiting sending a TLSv1.3 Client Hello inside established TLSv1.x connection (where x < 3). Is this something that the protocol should allow? If yes, renegotiation_info extension status would probably need to be updated. If not, then I think the document should be a bit more explicit about it. -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
- [TLS] TLSv1.2 connection renegotiation to TLSv1.3 Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] TLSv1.2 connection renegotiation to TLS… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] TLSv1.2 connection renegotiation to TLS… Hubert Kario