[TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-01
Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com> Tue, 04 March 2008 18:34 UTC
Return-Path: <tls-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-tls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tls-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD2728C232; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:34:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.36
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.36 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.077, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wY6ZC5eHvzo5; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AA53A6B75; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:34:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF3E3A6BDD for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:34:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ghb0Cggi5-f for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (unknown [74.95.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F43A6B75 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from romeo.rtfm.com (localhost.rtfm.com [127.0.0.1]) by romeo.rtfm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712085081A for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 10:35:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:35:44 -0800
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Message-Id: <20080304183544.712085081A@romeo.rtfm.com>
Subject: [TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tls-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tls-bounces@ietf.org
$Id: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-01-rev.txt,v 1.1 2008/03/04 18:15:11 ekr Exp $ This draft seems to mostly OK, but I think it still needs some changes. - The hash in client_certificate_url needs to be mandatory. IIRC, that was WG consensus when this was discussed. - In S 4, I wonder if too long packets MUST be rejected rather than may. -Ekr _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] Review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-01 Eric Rescorla