[TLS] update for tls- psk-null?

<home_pw@msn.com> Sat, 30 December 2006 20:37 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0kxI-0000El-BT; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:37:24 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0kxG-0000Eg-WF for tls@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:37:23 -0500
Received: from bay0-omc1-s35.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.107]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0kxF-00006Y-Lr for tls@ietf.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 15:37:22 -0500
Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.174.86]) by bay0-omc1-s35.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:21 -0800
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:20 -0800
Message-ID: <BAY103-DAV14225452DCCB2259D47F1692C50@phx.gbl>
Received: from 69.227.152.254 by BAY103-DAV14.phx.gbl with DAV; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:37:16 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [69.227.152.254]
X-Originating-Email: [home_pw@msn.com]
X-Sender: home_pw@msn.com
From: home_pw@msn.com
To: tls@ietf.org
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 12:37:31 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail desktop 8.0.1223
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V8.0.1223
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Dec 2006 20:37:20.0994 (UTC) FILETIME=[4DF12C20:01C72C52]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e8a67952aa972b528dd04570d58ad8fe
Cc:
Subject: [TLS] update for tls- psk-null?
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1274589774=="
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Procedurally, I don't support http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tls-psk-null-03.txt.

I think it should be slightly rewritten, declared to be a retrospective "update" to [TLS-PSK]. This would 
properly contextualize the material in the I-D, while achieving the stated goal of the current I-D ("augment").

Consider this, and consider withdrawing it from the RFC Editor queue. The adequacy of
the augmented ciphersuites (how many implementations,  etc) can then be evaluated as 
the TLS-PSK gets evaluated in its own standards track progress.
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls