IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] EXTERNAL: Re: Authentication Only Ciphersuites RFC

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 28 February 2019 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF4A130E69 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:54:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UjhnTKgGUz7Y for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E2B112F295 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 05:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1SDlYd3003272; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:22 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=sepl1mSBqFN5vtxqQNTes4YlNiIse/1+vW0xayaFwuU=; b=XOmLBOV93o2xq5WRjpCdgh0a83JnqBAGJjS/LfEU4wjWFtYVPAW8ovcGy95rzXcEZ+8M Hq90WrT+k/pm80qgdCa1nHenDMWYamAKlCpPVkxtpNbRnpUiTbIRgOORJSK4chkHK7cb J9TwhxvbaHuT/KXLM2qyRefJZ2BfwDYU2jHlhzOKduLTkCI3l84Y5eUBCyslEg0bN6za bIVKCqHmNY8P7RBQOfUwqFDfi68TPNRYB1Sf8IVJ/gXd+BVyWJWhslJ8LuLIZaJNgAQq emS/UFhXYnRuHfqgCh1UJl7TFpw2Ut/ZxRhJtJM8NAF81kEaK4/yH9YLSrJaYR676w01 2Q==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qwb4xf0vf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:21 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1SDlWie020900; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:54:20 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2qu2d0au55-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 08:54:20 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.101) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:54:19 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.131]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:54:19 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Jack Visoky <jmvisoky@ra.rockwell.com>
CC: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] EXTERNAL: Re: Authentication Only Ciphersuites RFC
Thread-Index: AQHUztWeusV1f16w9ki+yhUpn4RxR6X1nP4A//+wS4A=
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:18 +0000
Message-ID: <150E2CBA-14F6-4953-B6CF-241A117E2325@akamai.com>
References: <BN6PR2201MB1092B0FAD8AB0334CF151996997B0@BN6PR2201MB1092.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBPo3fDbCUoHWG84gnq0_uU5iyRXQgdboCYSeATpYdz=xg@mail.gmail.com> <BN6PR2201MB10920B409B6E38A36BB2DDC499740@BN6PR2201MB1092.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBOqvx0eaGDLuFSJy6f6voqO7b+Bj9keFvRAwW7MibUfDA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBOqvx0eaGDLuFSJy6f6voqO7b+Bj9keFvRAwW7MibUfDA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.16.1.190220
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.33.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_150E2CBA14F64953B6CF241A117E2325akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-02-28_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902280096
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-02-28_06:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902280096
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VHAKHoyHRSpIZmd7ibcXDqEC37o>
Subject: Re: [TLS] EXTERNAL: Re: Authentication Only Ciphersuites RFC
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 13:54:24 -0000

  *   Obviously, individuals should feel free to review this document or not as they please, but I'm not seeing any compelling reason why TLS-WG should take it on

+1 to all EKR said.

The meaning of TLS has gotten stronger over the years, and TLS now implies privacy.  Auth-only is not something the WG should be spending time on.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email