IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: [Pqc] Subject: Request for Technical Review: Internet-Draft draft-zhou-tls-tls14-03 – The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.4

Bocai Zhou <draft-ietf-tls-tls14@proton.me> Thu, 02 October 2025 07:27 UTC

Return-Path: <draft-ietf-tls-tls14@proton.me>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C950A6C48A62 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 00:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c-neVs-JYHvY for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 00:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-24425.protonmail.ch (mail-24425.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D87BD6C48A43 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2025 00:27:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1759390041; x=1759649241; bh=fe3kI80sphEik4S63IbmEWpa/3si7JOV/2PQXVU5108=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=TyVaxWKLj28M/e/phCnnkBMi/1d5o9ifoT7eHHQY4NvEJMhL/ueXbl1HmOMq38HYy CUtzJ/PSqHoUlVl7qg9Z5JayCjCXW9zOAWc32rpGsT15nmNE/xSUGb+h+labIOJkfX /lya/t/k7S3GssZ7/W6L1coRS3da/VqTWyWv5IpXMC2ke6NTvJcTYsD7B3akED9qct Y537yjuAxqqJ/cK2r1x/ds5rnCAeySI+CAOSzbwAcx6woMdHACFV4s9lUgAMNXdk1f Hh27cbht+vJXrSix38czxAj0zW3jj83FtYwTAlESLSMK9VjOWpKPLmhVWNeqL+N94X a5/GWC+2gllAg==
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 07:27:16 +0000
To: Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de>, "pqc@ietf.org" <pqc@ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
From: Bocai Zhou <draft-ietf-tls-tls14@proton.me>
Message-ID: <BxuGTI6_vozE4UAnX-MWMbGNREipwQiPTUM2mXg6XXzoFy0_ttgXg-ckWAVbb0Ug1UhhVgwjw3LVMKG1A3UuBGQ__iYmGUT7WaKup6nsgPk=@proton.me>
In-Reply-To: <8d7db312-60a0-41cf-9765-5411f77e3134@tu-dresden.de>
References: <jerRUY2dv5vtU_iIDMAVb-dsjVpSbT0ZuDAraDTaScLRwhriOgrXPyTgbHAfbjpfSty0zxfCurLpEDGSkhhsQSVc7ET2gvrTnkqMqIIK2VM=@proton.me> <CABcZeBNZvd5zj7uauoLTEBJqKv6j-U46+EAoPLgtLCLiLYxiVw@mail.gmail.com> <CZ15DI7px1ISRTumLWmNrRZ2o7E2rA-CgHwwnGt7ewhOjsIafYB-DJ-TfvcjHMtNZz3F4GI70Tj7swICV4jLouBycQo_wKf8lc5e9k-g-Fw=@proton.me> <8d7db312-60a0-41cf-9765-5411f77e3134@tu-dresden.de>
Feedback-ID: 157930850:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: cd8d6ee870d1538cd9d1f55a88645e7a3164e719
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; boundary="------0b0ed53f7a636dc74abffa90bd684e97c761b5c616a8e2222e42d756a88eedce"; charset="utf-8"
Message-ID-Hash: NEQ4CHVK3MNZAPB4SRUNA6TMPJNJEG5G
X-Message-ID-Hash: NEQ4CHVK3MNZAPB4SRUNA6TMPJNJEG5G
X-MailFrom: draft-ietf-tls-tls14@proton.me
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: [Pqc] Subject: Request for Technical Review: Internet-Draft draft-zhou-tls-tls14-03 – The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.4
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/VNVSRyc4qhZNfBJ_faaduCEIzOE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

You're right. The existing hybrid + PQT dual-certs solution is indeed much more mature than the one proposed in this draft. Thanks for pointing this out. I will withdraw the draft tonight.


使用 Proton Mail 安全邮箱发送。

2025年10月2日 星期四 下午 3:18，Muhammad Usama Sardar <muhammad_usama.sardar@tu-dresden.de> 来信：

> On 02.10.25 08:57, Bocai Zhou wrote:
> 

> > About dual chains and draft-yusef
> > Your correction that I spoke of “two certificates” rather than “two certificate chains” was crucial. Thank you for pointing to draft-yusef-tls-pqt-dual-certs; its structure is indeed more rigorous and better suited for path validation. I will adopt that approach immediately and add proper acknowledgement and citation to that draft and its authors to give them due credit.
> 

> I am still missing a good reason for why you will adopt that approach in your draft rather than contributing to that draft, and other ongoing PQ efforts in TLS WG.
> 

> -Usama

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status