Re: [TLS] renegotiation draft needs clarification !!

Michael Gray <mickgray@au1.ibm.com> Thu, 12 November 2009 08:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mickgray@au1.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9543A67B0 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:35:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OBh7Qyo9QjTp for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (e23smtp05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2ED3A68F5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d23relay03.au.ibm.com (d23relay03.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.245]) by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAC8XRX5010761 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:33:27 +1100
Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay03.au.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nAC8aMBr1806472 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:36:22 +1100
Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nAC8aMTu001777 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:36:22 +1100
Received: from d23ml003.au.ibm.com (d23ml003.au.ibm.com [9.190.250.22]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id nAC8aMpq001774 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:36:22 +1100
In-Reply-To: <B197003731D4874CA41DE7B446BBA3E829CB7DB0@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: Nasko Oskov <noskov@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0 HF277 June 21, 2006
Message-ID: <OF3CF406BC.8401C0CF-ON4A25766C.002F2574-4A25766C.002F405D@au1.ibm.com>
From: Michael Gray <mickgray@au1.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:36:06 +1000
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on d23ml003/23/M/IBM(Release 7.0.2FP3HF80 | July 14, 2008) at 12/11/2009 19:43:00
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] renegotiation draft needs clarification !!
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:35:56 -0000

> >>>> This leads to two different encodings, which are:
> >>>>
> >>>>  FF 01 00 00
> >>>>
> >>>>  FF 01 00 01 00
> >
> >I will selfishly vote for the second choice since that is
> >how I implemented it, though it would be easy to change.
>
> I interpreted it the same way, as an empty vector.
> Thanks,
> Nasko

Same here

Mick

> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls