Re: [TLS] Origin Bound Certificates extension?

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Thu, 25 June 2015 23:49 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FF21B2D1E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.389
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lVKrizf_h4rN for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vn0-x235.google.com (mail-vn0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c0f::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59DC1B2D1D for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vnbf7 with SMTP id f7so13378161vnb.7 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qdrexhJ/SkpJWhHSg9FfYWRGW6tZIiQW3GV7jIyJDnk=; b=cvsSbxQuefvOp5BX0YmbCVZexkgq2uXXtRW/Hy4ngSv9lmd8tvX9y82Cv2zNMmwqBp IP3CzTKYCiwwTHqPZHkFVaDpjZ8gJWIDmz3dX8ofgtS3GGtnj9DWWcZE8paL4A8FbAeA pJT0ljQC4httgJVghFMmjt2ICZth9vk+gZ4dDcJrUNKludBxZQB8fgsul1J9A/kCrnrs xC1hKjnmwNbv0Ac5HY7v7gFu8dPjUgTieOG7bqIsjDgw0iGY5DGlwW0FbHesk4Uf8GTB Mdw0UKY/enYq3Htu/z+HdNgFtbwOnAOv7ZG25Hrb56ublZpmjRmCL5LxkH5iopj4G6fR IUAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=qdrexhJ/SkpJWhHSg9FfYWRGW6tZIiQW3GV7jIyJDnk=; b=OcpnoGZ+ECgKio9Gj1w1hlpMSwiygjyera/XpQFhDMaVT7m+ilMtJ0lvmlTxDgPVPo Gw1MlZhOgYuewTn6+IwXLT4TMmr1VZ0/zneTkfnizoy3o6OVIJRtC7aSp0uPvvaMSj1j IT2QgNZNtbavi4DlOSLM1mmqCTKgrt45/0Cj3+wjrwNioDa1Kd2BCH6byE3dNb7BL+b3 R7cMhUoTpeMydSL5mW/xnmCYKqCEOVtwVfNRza0ty8CSFJMJT2lcZFSwzRjB4DCTaLY8 0R597uUUNW4M1xoDweQK0nvl2VwBqO2vQbN/CRU06siVvComUBt2NWM1nymEsW0DB9DI Gtkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlbPizycJrLOktDUC4lwAm2QjcbeDpmC+qfR3DgrRy7+n2a/usfogXO6TJ7E7kXXEJo3epl
X-Received: by 10.52.179.73 with SMTP id de9mr38309857vdc.28.1435276157998; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.67.150 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAH8yC8m8c+aaZzR0-rCzHr_n=B_2fO7nq4f1=Ju_PO+7oMY-Jw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH8yC8moyR6Ai865eKRmVEyp7X15OupxiFaFZJBKC74XVE_PEg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9PXLweB25vAbaPV-mSoOgCPcMZ-+Ly1+ZOa_iJtUELDB8yEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH8yC8m8c+aaZzR0-rCzHr_n=B_2fO7nq4f1=Ju_PO+7oMY-Jw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 16:48:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLzinfUGDYZ9UCbX2fWA4cUDer21XwHJ4bX22wApbByuUA@mail.gmail.com>
To: noloader@gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/WU8Gx93dppp39FO_VNMVeJ-vLwA>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Origin Bound Certificates extension?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 23:49:19 -0000

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> wrote:
> Should there be a ed25519 or similar?

When CFRG kick out a signature scheme I expect that would be a very
good candidate for inclusion. (Although CFRG will not be standardising
Ed25519 based on current discussions.)


Cheers

AGL