[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 22 October 2023 07:39 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F462C17060D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="lkm/zH+c"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="doRAdUmW"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cxh9LJl4bPut for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:39:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B369FC1705E3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061AC5C0309 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:39:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:39:10 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1697960350; x=1698046750; bh=5pjjVb6mxdjKqxEhxrhJOaL4Cg95ddPcEgW mE+y9cKo=; b=lkm/zH+c1rbrrhBGSWn4ym7kFdGG8CIlLJe4w0tPwMsV4pmL6B0 NYSebRLnVk6wyi0mbI+2Uq38dGd5gFUR3ERMvL4aO3Oxhhjs7cKq5n7T+0s8Pw/Q Bj+ZMeACC6n0tSID+KKg9IQ2+f7UumddaiTzrYhTh1JAnJh2a3HkE/TKRz9Rnqd4 DsIezzUREyqSdBc7ir6g8d/51xL+6uXip0etJf/DvXMEJ6+iCz4TlGEOCg77xcFd 9XhOR/bEfu+D+cPqOP3H+4ukkVHn8Nb3kQx/Lo7czoO/mtpDW8SncqP05tk0nnJ8 C9BIbOyCQE4I+fd1h95u7miArukT7RsIZ5A==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1697960350; x= 1698046750; bh=5pjjVb6mxdjKqxEhxrhJOaL4Cg95ddPcEgWmE+y9cKo=; b=d oRAdUmW40+4v9C2n8lCUSQrdDz5XAlVDOHMat8fytuzB1TT4flFPgI+i3PYrR2MM AA4MsjR8WVBUJxCOpP8PiiG45Rj1NH3yEBxpHB46CVUgUWDxzafZqbq59ZnGZujp nFODyUvH5GpaFBaYZeY/ClQaelCadK/lI+K7n5DP3cQItqAsRW9k9DxeaQ5xfkNV /8/iNlJ2ApZ/7tbq/Xb1RzXTEINJsC920oMqOW3mJc/jbrqSQkakKNaie2+ZTj8/ Idj3w+E0ugTOZhS6gbZHWdbvfV5vh9rI4cUjG4vNRjV/BdPMgSOyN8R/N31ld5jM BNYsAYLjCv+cSXkXXNOSw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ndE0ZZR7yYYAIBgYm-NTugBCrUZ8jeyp_ZQcVBkBUgRkFIX8J6YdJw> <xme:ndE0ZSyyNvWaq0rzdvGlHwMcN3al_235Osu8k1nXF0YwPKrT1jHvadfe-wc9pOzTp ltv7IKhrdro1kHN-A>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:ndE0Ze28Tew33PtIkywSwu2QcLFgAKQMQ3TT0FX7yra_0aVbb0W4OG-wmHqK-FXHQgcj7cmgOMTjdEe3tXlk0ZautuL8OuoGMl1e-6r9M3LqXbFOnMQmNKqyzXIH6HDwSoTOwA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrkedvgddujecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmnecujf gurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucet tghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmh hnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfef hfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtoh hmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugho pghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ndE0ZRDLNWpz4JPfw-EqX_m0b350v7n_eobG2OzaWOifOtFcuhrbGw> <xmx:ndE0ZSiaW9zZknHiwFzziwx_jqcxhI7A_aIdr8ydhZ8W4_R2L-wY-w> <xmx:ndE0ZVovR23iLi-Aog2wSomlzasdqChNSSsfDxhNTm7GoiKh9Ad5vA> <xmx:ntE0ZYd-1hiCWG-9bOJurkqbwMGGKRVGs2JMG_TcgqQrgPEymnSqCA>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:39:09 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8156811343066099664=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20231022073910.B369FC1705E3@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:39:10 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/XnK4R4OQn0t4QZwR3EOx9otX5Dk>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 07:39:35 -0000
Issues
------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+1/-4/💬10)
1 issues created:
- Are we quite right now with "MUST use public_name"? (by sftcd)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/572
1 issues received 10 new comments:
- #572 Are we quite right now with "MUST use public_name"? (10 by chris-wood, martinthomson, sftcd)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/572
4 issues closed:
- Reserve some code points for GREASE https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/451 [pre-wglc]
- Requirements language around retry configs may be too strong https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/565
- Make anonymity set references consistent (reference single definition?) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/568
- How to retry in ECH is ambiguous https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/524
Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+7/-7/💬32)
7 pull requests submitted:
- editorial: Thus -> This (by cjpatton)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/576
- Relax requirements around the outer SNI value (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/575
- Avoid a normative reference to WHATWG-IPV4 (by davidben)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/574
- Limit DNS label length (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/573
- Only one anonymity set definition (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/571
- Relax requirements around retry config usage (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/570
- Initial grease codepoints (by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/569
3 pull requests received 32 new comments:
- #575 Relax requirements around the outer SNI value (20 by chris-wood, ekr, sftcd)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/575
- #573 Limit DNS label length (1 by chris-wood)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/573
- #569 Initial grease codepoints (11 by chris-wood, davidben, kazuho, sftcd)
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/569
7 pull requests merged:
- editorial: Thus -> This
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/576
- Initial grease codepoints
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/569
- Relax requirements around retry config usage
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/570
- Only one anonymity set definition
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/571
- Limit DNS label length
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/573
- Avoid a normative reference to WHATWG-IPV4
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/574
- Punt on new transport connection specifics
https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/562
* tlswg/tls13-spec (+1/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests submitted:
- md fixes (by seanturner)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1329
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #1328 Use aasvg for pictures (1 by seanturner)
https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1328
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls
* https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team
- [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Dra… Repository Activity Summary Bot