IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 04 April 2018 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04902124205; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 01:19:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OebyQA_wvUPO; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 01:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22b.google.com (mail-oi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 471B21201FA; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 01:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id e123-v6so18453134oih.13; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 01:19:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LPmLZPQ1a7wvybIRWQGqFzYjhKg2b5vjrD+eEJwEo5U=; b=cGxQkZsok5QbveTltKtM9DEvCZ09ac2LGcNKHoOAkSmSzryDbq6qwpLw3TyC0W4pU3 2Jtrs37/Ehhax45oPmwQUeRtSotg+Qc2GR6PwT/87phB/CrrTYjrVBSuHJoPz2FBjDND wmk9iR1UOf8/UHeUTPCBcvl/c6Kg2VL4nRs+9wiGe3qmHlhRxU/070bqTKUgyNoyWQ7W ssnPzHuOo9CHfIMd/ymlMSTPcStDkMN5zgiBgD4cCjY/jL9r8IeYAizmOstxVj6HxqK3 A+g7ZxQ1CalUDM035cdf0Be45KsLXjvfm66dmQpSV44PpfhtwHK0T5aU9yT4y8SZLqdM 4vSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LPmLZPQ1a7wvybIRWQGqFzYjhKg2b5vjrD+eEJwEo5U=; b=AjHdQpFAwDSD8pp/bisWqtINfcu6dVQW9zzmUZDrd5V2uYLQQp5AJcHzzh9hqx4mFr NnHCNDwb2izieM4CnCkgZKMCWi5IVBX3rtyrWJTDjRqKJOukzlYeyBvFgKldSN8SY9lv e6vYTK7H7LOR4D9Dp3y77v7gZ/sSDMj2Qt8tmHk3VtECtEzUOLlb5unevzURTyFyNIGd IxJzgQJhuiqdY+vOPlNfINN62jQb9fmMO67Qf+w/BfL+X5vjPgahAFHB8EmiBCjbi3UC cQnB1u2uUoAboYqF9twU7U2icbosO9w75wvxbZhhCACQXs1eD3Fqta5hA7AVpczuf2Tu n1QA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tAyLMysuWils3yB7co0yrpomPUPb7z7GCCRChAmWR7sJjpIFIYW MHdwnsgYeOzanO1bMq7Z3NmJG3GbdY8natvhCpqrlA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49r7RkAAhZxMj5ryi2N5AkpegsIjplnDEcM80QK5CHA5u0+vHrrKNWZf7q59qeGUNd50Z9cudSPvjE9j9sEoZM=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:4ac2:: with SMTP id x185-v6mr8809658oia.295.1522829967563; Wed, 04 Apr 2018 01:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:ac7:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Apr 2018 01:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5005fa90-021c-f947-baac-27b86a1acba4@nostrum.com>
References: <152282152084.23972.5999986320638189748.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABkgnnUuHpHuDpsC9jDS36pw8c4xX-z5ODry1+J0CCPpQWxrYw@mail.gmail.com> <5005fa90-021c-f947-baac-27b86a1acba4@nostrum.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 18:19:27 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUvBzkqO_r4jk5agf=OHcJnOEz-D8BAvfTEiDsfSsKX8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-record-limit@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, tls-chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/YHL24Rcj8yXoHs3ljwr6ZULCbr4>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 08:19:30 -0000

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>> A server MUST NOT enforce this restriction; a client might advertise a
>>> higher limit that is enabled by an extension or version the server does not
>>> understand.
>
> It would, if it were present. The IESG is reviewing version -02 of the
> document, in which that text does not appear. (I see it's in your repo, so
> presumably the -03 version will address the issue I highlight).

My fault.  Sean prompted me to push out a new version, then IESG
reviews started coming in, so I held back.  That was the result of a
secdir review.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email