IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] OCSP stapling problem

Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com> Wed, 19 December 2018 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F88512D4F0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:40:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gc7SxzkyGHwj for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8301C130E86 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [47.143.125.221] (helo=Williams-MacBook-Pro.local) by elasmtp-curtail.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4) (envelope-from <frantz@pwpconsult.com>) id 1gZlSP-00054X-4o for tls@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:40:53 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:40:52 -0800
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <20181219191516.GB79754@straasha.imrryr.org>
Message-ID: <r480Ps-10142i-1A614A07BA204BFF8410F945E7E2DE7F@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Mailsmith 2.4.3 (480)
X-ELNK-Trace: 3a5e54fa03f1b3e21aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec7989ab13cd4e864978b3af347da1bbf00c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 47.143.125.221
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ZJjOMuem2zrOIK7nOH0ewIcKBdI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] OCSP stapling problem
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:40:56 -0000

On 12/19/18 at 11:15 AM, ietf-dane@dukhovni.org (Viktor Dukhovni) wrote:

> What I'd rather see is automation of certificate rotation, and
> increasingly (decreasingly?) short certificate lifetimes as
> with Let's Encrypt.

I think what you wanted to say was "increasingly shorter certificate lifetimes" :-)

Happy New Year - Bill

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz        | Concurrency is hard. 12 out  | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506      | 10 programmers get it wrong. | 16345 Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com |                - Jeff Frantz | Los Gatos, CA 95032

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email