IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Fri, 31 March 2017 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F60F129406 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jXDKMI68dilB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673F8124281 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id r142so70990046qke.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=t470mcSGESrn3p2yJlL8N7UHiPMedGeaGXgBz4yr83s=; b=cYSLPD7eQxPS/LeZPKWKW+8Rqn+lvialhbScLvaALufEfOLHYNo3jh+6HK2ifIQNy1 80JpwtjhOCrzJXc7WnZTks4Rolv92j2W7bFjY1M1RzE3hDgktuDdcBMznDpNlrnzTVEI Jf7Udqt7wGkGetNOrsOaNrqBuo6OTA6Nui8Qim0HC1QiB+/hulmEM6i6CFjStGHE6PaI jy7Z6eGWy4ex+M5Ktg0EwpIzpwgNrRNYi3a5vOuDw93fjFSFLv4P+HaBcnZIEfgXpOdU 6pmXb7z4QhGiRzJ/PZFHTLFDUZP9p6PT5Nn75pHRxNdOJKfZGP3ECPyL4KCk0geqzcHj HzXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t470mcSGESrn3p2yJlL8N7UHiPMedGeaGXgBz4yr83s=; b=TqLm1dhZX8Ve5p+1DgdlTMo9uI55yJMijzfVnzrkECytkGSUlJ/+rudAO/3f/FIUxr f/w7PcSLOqEYk7ulVPnAi4UWI0lWNB5X3hD4kdWPUPpQfaWAd3RrzyHYp7gWA2JP5f1f +HGMXaUfmyTPRSOyPBOZMIqmMSMagi+2RvUZwR/sR0yWWYLWa1mwjRRmXe3cxsjuSp9s B6gHYnfV20FjHcFAb+8cesA+TZCBzceyhhskbExvO4uW1cHnd+pxbnp3+65FRkf71oaS 4jLgQsalE75oiy+jVx+Mwa0yYju8iP7FLgEe0YolfAWe48UO51TV3vXjOVtjk9gG2Gh/ RNFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0X9u6Yg7oXkej2itOkSYhn/2tl4KFfgE3vUl/0k6QvYCF+IfgJNJ6kWXDK7LSuW01eQ6+hmhS7mce+Mw==
X-Received: by 10.55.126.195 with SMTP id z186mr3651678qkc.144.1490976674571; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.27.194 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 09:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBNywaOQMZTh439ysSKEbLGYa+VYUwGHaTY2NrppYyhGsw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <025D3ABD-199F-421A-9265-6F960135A3B7@sn3rd.com> <58D8C395.8090707@ssi.gouv.fr> <2d2675c3-4495-a373-560e-b9327aa595bc@drh-consultancy.co.uk> <CABcZeBNywaOQMZTh439ysSKEbLGYa+VYUwGHaTY2NrppYyhGsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:11:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CABkgnnUtdTSdS3=E=uni5xnMuQe4Pq6z5QJXHs7DWtnd5wJYTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Dr Stephen Henson <lists@drh-consultancy.co.uk>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ZLnzsGbDAQpY5FS5qRoli2bqJhg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WGLC: draft-ietf-tls-tls13-19
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:11:17 -0000

On 31 March 2017 at 09:20, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm assuming that once the client has responded with a Certificate message
>> it
>> MUST send CertificateVerify and Finished afterwards and nothing else is
>> permissible? That is it can't send application data or respond to other
>> outstanding CertificateRequest messages?
>
>
> I think that was our intention but I agree the text ended up a bit unclear.
> Absent some
> argument, i'll update the text to require it.

This is a great idea.  I don't think that our code would enforce this
constraint, but I don't really want to see interleaving here.  We
don't have interleaving anywhere else.

v2.36.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status