Re: [TLS] [therightkey] Fwd: Improving EV Certificate Security

Ben Laurie <benl@google.com> Thu, 26 September 2013 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <benl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0468111E8184 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ecRcebJXCN5S for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F241B11E818A for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x13so1136268ief.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=DU03Vd+OZu0tZEQ9Zxkd4vuySKW67LQpsdHcXuzG4V8=; b=KqJP/hU5INRC9WBt8AW7yGRbmPYOTHlcgwSSA1rYJVL5gRfuc50+evJRGKTSPHFXwp nekVKbsu4TNBbVnLo9y9NJ6GUgkySDidqSsce7sAzndBzjVVsVrKXCIzYr4DcmIBt8Yb fgvx2u1cFxV4CsjIge+mG25M1jlOgQ1jtMEqxg252SB5BDXPhkB+USuyvc3dhDJfvGVD aNViyKKrNz8gQgQc2ej5e+q3so56jTJDveJ/i+Pw4YeRuHW8rA852Q+5+ngbUOSJxUIu qDDpqNTDw3N5/J0OQyYGiKg5+H8RmWYsLo6olhr7/I8n9HMUNstO3qMBke0eW9LFDBpD Y70A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DU03Vd+OZu0tZEQ9Zxkd4vuySKW67LQpsdHcXuzG4V8=; b=EWeiMh92IljOomeul8Ph2mFfCfanuoVkXr+ISCYn+fAea07ScxgVOGw/hIrSEUUKg0 mANpzoa1NWc8wYkK0O/SQVjfh8Ooeo1RfdIA4n9I2Uv+nAJcMI+UyDIhpu5EIEBYihW7 s3lkuEmVwZKPPHJpqVO53TvZEFrLJqojGlcNLwnf8eIN8QEmNCkJks3frJry3UAwqVyy r8NtOB9IMtWKred7s6bJhKmub7o4d//XqLwMqN+K1kXudTSY/KM+bDqDfllAfdelqBgr psJjFPZ+Yie9DiLyrLxznAGnw6bgFcWngPklOWvriGS8qXmb0MEwiO15QtfQewVwUOQM UhVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlrLvV3xPehmrKgZzlYDg/i3B/fK7WOppxQ+UAla3gXYjbKUJeqi9GBI5PaweFt8EdDMueaQcDU9rF4Lqnba6qicNtanspri8KACwpuLW7B44ndA4hECkwD8pz8oq4Ee78vfcHvjPCmI02ubltBDHf3xfizOxU16NN+bbrttLPJvRCE2y5CYrTdqTWSGNb2C35stkkA
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.190.17 with SMTP id dg17mr351314icb.44.1380192944873; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.230.140 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 03:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOe4UikiA6vLnZXCxyUdK=VXRUgKf6T5k--anEJiPvK59KWVzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABrd9STHiKL-ecavLCkw1jqGyLAUwEQb61yJWhZV9fFKbSR8vA@mail.gmail.com> <CABrd9STcVGiYb9QBrezFza=Lhpcc=Hwh4h03R4gomCYVp=zLUw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4UikiA6vLnZXCxyUdK=VXRUgKf6T5k--anEJiPvK59KWVzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:55:44 +0100
Message-ID: <CABrd9STs7TimumEC=ee7-=1O05j=xFo1P3Nhj4YHyaH5LFkfRA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
To: Joseph Bonneau <jbonneau@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [therightkey] Fwd: Improving EV Certificate Security
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:56:06 -0000

On 26 September 2013 06:15, Joseph Bonneau <jbonneau@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd like some elaboration on the plan for step 6, creating a whitelist of
> valid EV certificates without an SCT. How is this going to be achieved?

Not sure what the question is - as the doc says, the list will be
constructed from the logs...