[TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 19 February 2006 19:47 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1-ext.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAuWV-00075z-8m; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:11 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAuWT-00075d-QR for tls@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 -0500
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com ([144.202.243.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FAuWT-0003OV-ID for tls@ietf.org; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:47:09 -0500
Received: (qmail 9950 invoked by uid 0); 19 Feb 2006 19:47:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Russ-Laptop.vigilsec.com) (72.66.14.34) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2006 19:47:03 -0000
Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060219142550.05b67890@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:27:06 -0500
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060219033213.85B213C028D@berkshire.machshav.com>
References: <(Your message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:31:13 PST.") <20060219013238.779CC22241D@laser.networkresonance.com> <20060219033213.85B213C028D@berkshire.machshav.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: tls@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Steve & Eric:

The document that is in Last Call gives the IETF complete change 
control.  There is no process issue.

Russ

At 10:32 PM 2/18/2006, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
>In message <20060219013238.779CC22241D@laser.networkresonance.com>, 
>Eric Rescor
>la writes:
>
> >
> >Since the IETF would not have change control, this is an inappropriate
> >work item for the TLS WG and therefore the authors appear to have
> >decided on an Individual Submission. The reason for the intended status
> >of Proposed Standard
>
>Do we have a process issue here?  Can we have a Proposed Standard
>without the IETF having change control?  (2026 speaks of change control
>only in the context of a WG.)
>
>                 --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls