Re: [TLS] Fwd: TLS Paris Interim Minutes

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Wed, 05 November 2014 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 812351A8915 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:19:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.973
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.973 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KA3jYhzBnULK for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 449771A8916 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id q108so11984424qgd.41 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 06:19:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=eQnB0h+agV0weC7pUgRQOrpS8jXaRe7926qnjckFcF4=; b=ArGYpE8MVR7lKADmL3tidmc9praD4alhiL9Wo5YUz0A2em8a6lkZzfBuUTBO2mnaBt Kmipyv6uP1GEPrmQtQz3NIxy/nER4Vhbesm/qIHWsEcBSM6ku/qSxsmn1dalTCCH6jw6 eBuI+puuq/RVoOFnik4SxcHUTImfyTYY2ET30kI+u8vPJjarcGeYJ8WIxnbA/5gcv7az n9m2sJtGqIGfmEMwvdw53pPCh2uezRni/g/MiMq//YQr4SgkDIPvD9ac594iwz3tILsX MvHpHgHNITeS81dRfX4+irpmf4tseDUrgEDsTp5t/HQHy4yczBPvcEzZuQPBwp+8SScH StnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=eQnB0h+agV0weC7pUgRQOrpS8jXaRe7926qnjckFcF4=; b=REs95XhwGjHtyxc7+lI01RW4wxTC3ALTd7j0uU051AE8kWoVuUBuDOV/hB4QXuHIjG vhfokX4sWUUvGAUyiRRxQph5+V/AaPJ0rlr+W4iFh7kVgQbPDEYYgFU8GAfU5r8o5F5/ 7zYcgbTsiLDbOloImFNgfZ3Iye0n7GLPdq+025BNmF1wztw5+ZxRgkgKr7NciKKlA0ba rJfwdR1mdL5qCc4S/rJ3xD9MkVV4boxDvzIR0r8Woqt/DSsYH4agwpaXZf3vdGqXUVMG Oz9jtABWF7dTIc81FHX/H63WbgbVh+b/tBk1Ax1WKi3ZYJIY14il5pag2vqd+ikOUAoB 4Z7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmK6BMr4ohsEONQoEGLfZv0YOG54OfdOUQuHB/4VnzDAn4XsDk/P+kJgmzZtiWPNvPMAABI
X-Received: by 10.224.125.68 with SMTP id x4mr88393610qar.78.1415197145213; Wed, 05 Nov 2014 06:19:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.10.69 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 06:18:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADMpkcL6=+qMVWwsd8xC0kmnDEPfA0Q2fXLx-p3znNDvuW=zpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <54A8F330-D25A-40FF-81BF-7CA35C69343C@ieca.com> <CADMpkcKrTFGOyCwMEcRK3Sftqy5QTsYtb93LYn_FBpG35J6bmg@mail.gmail.com> <CADMpkcL6=+qMVWwsd8xC0kmnDEPfA0Q2fXLx-p3znNDvuW=zpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 06:18:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLyDTodniZ4n6Uy8mtpNRMY02LeKwKtt9CwhjEbDZDrtBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_2rlk_zgljhu2WRzpKJhaLk74ZA
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Fwd: TLS Paris Interim Minutes
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 14:19:08 -0000

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Bodo Moeller <bmoeller@acm.org> wrote:
> This isn't correct, and isn't what was said at the meeting. As discussed at
> the meeting, YouTube currently allows two cipher suites for video streams,
> TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 and TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA, but Firefox
> doesn't support the former without ECDHE
> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1029179).

Some locations additionally support ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256,
which we are testing now.


Cheers

AGL