Re: [TLS] New "Fast-Track" draft posted

I'm joining the discussion a little bit late.  Is there still time to
consider 1-RTT version of the full-handshake described in "Fast-Track"
paper? (i.e. client sends the ClientKeyExchange message speculatively before
receiving the ServerHello).

- nagendra

2009/3/4 Stefan Santesson <stefans@exmsft.com>

>  As a result of the discussions we had around last IETF I have now posted
> a new “Fast Track” inspired draft.
>
> The name of this draft is  draft-santesson-tls-certcache-00
> It will be available in a few days from the I-D repository. Until then it
> can be obtained from the staging site at:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-santesson-tls-certcache-00.txt
>
> I have chosen to do a completely new draft instead of updating the old
> fast-track document as I have used a very simplified approach as starting
> point.
> My document is limited to one new TLS extension with the sole purpose of
> including a hash of a cached cert path to allow this cert path to be omitted
> from the server Certificate message.
>
> I submitted this draft to inject some energy into the discussion again but
> I’m not locked on the approach if there are good reasons to expand it.
> Please read and provide comments.
>
> I would like to request a small time slot on the TLS meeting agenda in San
> Francisco to discuss this if possible.
>
>
> *Stefan Santesson
> *AAA-sec.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>