IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Short notes on TLS RFCs ...

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 20 June 2014 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9387B1A0298 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id boWc1sXKrYXh for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0C11A03D6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id cc10so1141206wib.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MyGXcYKyb2vqVJUtq4SJN/khWINCtUmP+ot26iqh8qQ=; b=kAuzGrlOsdwwX4Rb14cDalAO4DeAtFba2KHOh29TW619jDIhNgKnGOmnhhgxoZJvsP wsgxUXXXlU5uLnHj+8pxI2K1pxGe2z/SiyjUPHs7zpE5Iv0NwY2WGfhr1xxFRjew2lsj xpJ4RIiFQBXFaheeRkKpPHkkr5pWuiH6HEEy7nozmJ02iWDyG8kHHXgyP2LfaPBy4J18 gfpW6go8D8i9rzQpPgn5NH5Q9SE/cTcKP2m8AhF50nxlz244h5EZvb2Ip0HJfZUIhpSV FiIdQK4LgEIbRo/DZz+2Y8CTCg1A/VH1zh8O57eYCRW05YFabrZ0IlBkTuqMJplLaB/u hJ3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmy714E7RwBZXGIqgmz4s8UrsFIFPzqVtdELCZyMzwZHkzG3pdGEeR+KOrLyL2emShLoDKn
X-Received: by 10.194.110.10 with SMTP id hw10mr5871509wjb.81.1403282619024; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:43:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.218.198 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2620:101:80fc:232:7437:1051:6a18:da2]
In-Reply-To: <CAAF6GDep=+BCL2JE9XabPeNkKoNMHrV9PDH-orjrHD9gTSFWag@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAF6GDfWGkZkYxvCHA+fScLzFse8bafDDd91Cgg_i-_UTu-Q0w@mail.gmail.com> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7181E9EA8DF@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAAF6GDep=+BCL2JE9XabPeNkKoNMHrV9PDH-orjrHD9gTSFWag@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 09:42:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPO1JbP8NnGXrYcpgSa7ftbFVHm8_KUfrUeYHQUVAUP+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e010d870c06e72c04fc4732e4"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_IrA4_dtq5zMyNnQilbxd-X408o
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Short notes on TLS RFCs ...
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:43:41 -0000

The draft has been updated.

Thanks!

-Ekr



On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>
wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 4:50 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> > Thanks; it is always useful to have a fresh pair of eyes!
> >
> >>  I think a future RFC could benefit from a small repair work here and
> I'd be happy to contribute if that's appropriate.
> >
> > Yes, particularly if you have suggested wording.
>
> Thanks for the encouragement, I have made the following suggested
> change via a pull request;
>
> https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/46
>
> Hopefully it can be considered an editorial change and non-controversial.
>
> --
> Colm
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email