Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmusic-comedia-tls
Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com> Tue, 03 January 2006 17:46 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EtqET-00084G-MC; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:46:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EtqER-00082t-Lj; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:45:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA01321; Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:44:45 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200601031744.MAA01321@ietf.org>
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] ident=mailnull) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EtqJj-0004Ge-LZ; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 12:51:29 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=psg.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mankin@psg.com>) id 1EtqEM-0009ee-Vq; Tue, 03 Jan 2006 17:45:54 +0000
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@networkresonance.com>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmusic-comedia-tls
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 09:45:54 -0800
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: Jonathan Lennox <lennox@cs.columbia.edu>, hartmans+ietf@mit.edu, tls@ietf.org, jon.peterson@neustar.biz, mmusic@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
> > > One other question -- in the IESG review, the issue was raised that > > there's not currently an IANA registry for textual names of hash > > functions. I agreed to add an IANA considerations section for this > > purpose, but I was wondering if there's interest in having this > > registry be more broadly scoped than just for comedia-tls? > > Well, as far as TLS goes, we only use integer code points, so this > wouldn't buy us anything, but speaking personally I think this > would be a good idea. Ekr, I somehow missed Jonathan's original question about this. I'll support making this registry broad-based as long as we don't have to troubleshoot it a lot from the security side. Essentially this is going to be an IANA space for SDP-folk determined names of the algorithms from RFCs 3280 and 4055 (and later, any RFCs which update 4055). The reason I don't want to use the broad registry if it entails debugging is that it's not very likely to be in the consciousness of future security developers, not being integrated into a reference security RFC, and there's not much precedent (if any) for using the same registry for multiple protocols. Allison _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
- [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmusic-c… Allison Mankin
- Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmus… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmus… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmus… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmus… Allison Mankin
- Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmus… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Brief Cross-WG review - draft-ietf-mmus… Sam Hartman