IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] dispatching DTLS 1.2 errata

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 04:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04062C14F73E for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wxNWJrS2v75b for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D20C5C14F712 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-29fbe140c24so1887024a91.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; t=1710907921; x=1711512721; darn=ietf.org; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PXVgxeIUHeSL4njJRdZ4TwZriAGIIyp5l9K8meWHXBI=; b=WC51mlV7Oa6R28pEG3L3PgaiYYdr2+YqN6QghFELMtqrZFeAeJGv09GxqHA9CpQdBc pLpYmXFDlUVvJLRzSxRz6HUY+3UbOhM3g1cFtFz6+RYE9vC0cq5D2nzJqMG/nKd5+sar 4aSR0kCsFfNecafumZWB8jFLLYs+1Vjw6wRfM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710907921; x=1711512721; h=to:cc:date:message-id:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PXVgxeIUHeSL4njJRdZ4TwZriAGIIyp5l9K8meWHXBI=; b=rutj/Fqf0IyZKE5JAXB+EJm1aOzsgw6SAmCruxJJFMt30YREnDAhiVxIKx58o4Y0WP qzG2pX6EoymIhup0hCUuEpW2pPMpZ/RTaB75Fx1urfFmmPUDiYmwfkRyZPxZ+30pC0eL adabUClOLdFRAfmsonUxNC938RIKrVgppER0AF6yejFaW9Zq+2pssY58NLmyy8Wd1QAJ CdVFU4i6f9BGvoCdeEQgPkWJrVQdSw3mHL1UZNV8kb99zDbfQG9RXYq75SBFExI3Gh9p mCDAaJOExFOomyB8YRzP3n5RubamBvGhqVd4Nz5eppjthiLM+58pDC+Yh1qeL8euepr3 vhUA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz22jn+qEZeTbBqc69VOdbZ4j4/Kf7XQo/E8E+/2Ke9FxV6TqWf 4FOR/chTFHZXMJSUng6Idl6jDNI2RD+mWJtRL/xu4BBAmKV7pzk4nteGl8KJ8N1NKD46zMumNVr s
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHCjtIeXv+ReF4NiRBm12SgVT7ivgwOfiw0lEYs3jT++RGt2lSUKuZtlPhxGCg4K4tykYkCSA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4943:b0:29b:f8b4:28bd with SMTP id c61-20020a17090a494300b0029bf8b428bdmr875596pjh.12.1710907920768; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2001:67c:370:128:988:bba5:f757:afe]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ss11-20020a17090b2ecb00b0029c693a1e6dsm446689pjb.17.2024.03.19.21.11.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Mar 2024 21:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.15\))
Message-Id: <6E3019FA-222C-4D26-9D18-AF5769935695@sn3rd.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:11:54 +1000
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/_oYWTElq14ad83RygED2AiUI4ek>
Subject: [TLS] dispatching DTLS 1.2 errata
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 04:12:07 -0000

Hi! We’ve got 8 reported errata on DTLS 1.2 (RFC 6347):
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6347&rec_status=15&presentation=records
that we, the royal we where we is the WG, need to dispatch.  By way of background, the
IESG has the following statement about processing errata on the IETF stream:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-processing-of-rfc-errata-for-the-ietf-stream-20210507/
Based on the IESG statement, please let me know by 3 April if you disagree with the following proposed
resolutions:

1. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid3917

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347 and extensions is added to the ClientHello struct (see s5.3).

2. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4103

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347 and HelloVerifyRequest is no longer applicable to DTLS 1.3.

3. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5186

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347 and the section in question was extensively revised; the offending text is removed or no longer applies.

4. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4104

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347and the paragraph in questions was extensively revised; the offending text is removed.

5. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4105

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347 and the two sections were merged into one.

6. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4642

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347, the field has been renamed, and the field’s explanation updated.

7. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5903

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347 and the paragraph in questions was extensively revised; the offending text is reworded.

8. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5026

Proposed dispatch: reject
Rationale: RFC 9147 obsoletes RFC 6347 and the 2119-language for the length is no longer in RFC 9147.

Cheers,
spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email