IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Curve25519 in TLS and Additional Curves in TLS

Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Wed, 09 April 2014 11:50 UTC

Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57FF1A0234 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.174
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.174 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngCXuttY_XdC for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B911A021C for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 04:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s39BoYgL001123 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 07:50:35 -0400
Received: from [10.34.2.127] (dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com [10.34.2.127]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s39BoVQN020094 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 9 Apr 2014 07:50:32 -0400
Message-ID: <1397044231.4019.4.camel@dhcp-2-127.brq.redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 13:50:31 +0200
In-Reply-To: <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120AC18CAE@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <87ob3456s1.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <20140402164340.GA14790@roeckx.be> <20140407115102.3011d2e5@latte.josefsson.org> <CACsn0cmFLO2n8d-FVVb4wu=G5T88E7rRd8b=eYo-1uMZnMxkOQ@mail.gmail.com> <5344BD77.2020106@fifthhorseman.net> <2A0EFB9C05D0164E98F19BB0AF3708C7120AC18CAE@USMBX1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.24
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/gzjcCE6Uiu7nMuAgIW-Tam47e38
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Curve25519 in TLS and Additional Curves in TLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 11:50:39 -0000

On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 07:37 -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I support it to, but I want to see it in little-endian format, which requires a bit more coordination before it could be published.

I believe you have already made your point several times. I think it is
important to see comments from people who plan or work on implementing
this draft, how each format affects them and whether there is a need for
little-endian.

regards,
Nikos

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email