IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Questions about ALPN

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Wed, 09 April 2014 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0101A03E7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNoeeajSBVpn for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22a.google.com (mail-ve0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231D91A032E for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id pa12so2392019veb.29 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=G3sViBB40V4T2l+JTfzPOMjRs8KPZ087C21tC/B5KG4=; b=SSavo/pJK8OQqiVHoVsYv32o/7CxmJd67ClT9qYcCpaITDCI54jTIC2inpr0Bb9xP4 T2MCXZUP9o5Eq9PrhAaNtgGa6/CMOt/X11uP6cqYcKK9ybxszCOnwImzujUJAgI6E1ER 5bGM7FQTBsngi61edFK6RMsuBINp5k0in4pvG2eOgp4k+iSQ44id4gaPsYH2Otfv51ve Vt8jM5KX0UumfVZ8Y3uLB8Qf+pWhbdhe9I8KNjmI4O/Lf5qWFtlY0QzDQHinD2ZHu1KW ic2iRUBcUv3+zgqCpPjOYa4NSr8ubpCh+ufBlWdSTS4tezvRletwFm7zWxiv40+tsaQa TcTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=G3sViBB40V4T2l+JTfzPOMjRs8KPZ087C21tC/B5KG4=; b=Ujx0oFT/X9iLzXBdeq1ecgKnDpnKiW72SWnS5unFREAPmgA37e7sZZ0nBJjT4CaCC4 4ULr4RoVnRls2lWcadSlbyNMRSHhjFwf5YXdLzKWOdCI9BJR1yrfavH/oieQzj6c4pt/ tz4E7xFhS1rlzcJM2ABNxoDkDNA9zV9prKhVzPUhew4h5Vz2UvfBk/y7dIQwnXRLyr87 CtnlAOIL/3CiFjDbYiHBVdwpDxt90+6bzWi1WCfh4Z+iol9Q30tKPDnfswSKf0shgyzc 5187pSZCRnGImQzvA9c8/Q35t3v/CPEpS0Ry8CYxicoNJV4nDWNk7gzaK1BVcu/Uek35 ZAaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnor7erc1YSGErd647NAjdYP/8zpv5Um5ODxc0mgVpKfDjquI7vXURPi50CDXXQD19oPAwrIYZCBZpoPtbUOLzdNdzO9Uy0BVp21r5+mGC6+R2tLsZmMOKz2XOCOc/JD2V4PUh1iEU50K5urdShiWB7Prq+NqUGcp++mNas7pA5vOe8dKPPEOBXqmSA01RGSeaMoPnW
X-Received: by 10.220.147.16 with SMTP id j16mr9752430vcv.14.1397062193411; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.98.225 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUvfHUwHH-BKQjHqToao4FqzRTRhHZBw7cROFXoq1Ftiw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53456D1B.1010804@alum.mit.edu> <CAL9PXLzF5AZ4WuTdCUBu3BY0BDRBj=120DnJefMd7hs-0hcU5w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUvfHUwHH-BKQjHqToao4FqzRTRhHZBw7cROFXoq1Ftiw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 09:49:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLw1Z-MBU0N=BWdiXW=C9rjG7pXc7zhnOdzwMUavSb-GwQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/hWTUhloU6ZDm4_L9CIreuHvgFKw
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Questions about ALPN
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 16:49:55 -0000

On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oops:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-11#section-11.1
>
> Actually, I think that this is a good (re)use of the registry.  Sure,
> it doesn't make sense to identify protocols within (D)TLS, but often
> non-(D)TLS protocols need to be identified alongside (D)TLS protocols,
> as is the case with the above.  (If you are confused about the where
> this happens exactly, see
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-11#section-6.11).

I wouldn't add h2c to the ALPN registry for this case, but I don't
feel strongly.


Cheers

AGL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email