Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com> Fri, 27 July 2018 09:13 UTC
Return-Path: <nmav@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09145130E13 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 02:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CbjAYLEhrrQd for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 02:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB9312F295 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 02:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b15-v6so4313087wrv.10 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 02:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hYrPiwfon9t0UpXgYFL1o7SUqHcvSC6Gmz7VZGDTfU0=; b=iiafpjqZhajgQFBaxQvUNug5Odk4VkMiTQ5Q7pXgvwMWGsnvhR1xqKJHjOkESjCjkS 0/ZaZHIAL5cyyIsJ8VasikYbDPZscWYdi3Y5L3oZggTI1NvxWoa7U//BxWmOO8SAq3gR grPFuTJ8pLtWTBXfZ0u9SpIRF5bwT1lk2ySQnbl4tE23NVYGvcR4tlJypsNXcFU7ypJ9 M/42vvpgfjPBaj+IPjLjNHjSnJSQqbhqfDu3yXsR6MYE0bRcK+YK/haY6NubOPWjc3BW gg559Omd/8sE2mqM4EV3jaWnTp3iKWGXnDJKbyc6XMfrARnI/bn/XsHRYnGzV/Ql0WxX Qjrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlFO74v2rC8RE88bTKz9j18ZymJ1WV7VHF91qUjnLyCvrnVmFNnx 9w0zcrBpKEse4aN2mmZI81lQsAaWBUw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpej1Gq9dayjGcPGjI/p0r4nNlKsZgTy1Q+OE1kTXnKyco0rxyxyAJJ6cd1xxVzDOeB/ZlYrxg==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:992d:: with SMTP id x42-v6mr3973983wrb.81.1532682819708; Fri, 27 Jul 2018 02:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-10-40-1-102.brq.redhat.com (nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com. [213.175.37.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v5-v6sm2683252wru.60.2018.07.27.02.13.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 27 Jul 2018 02:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e45f5be0feae2e163e051b192a7d344ba40ab57b.camel@redhat.com>
From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:13:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAO8oSXmXFvSwtJea5peECYcBSUz9zRqW=NH7gvKFQN+EFBhSJw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO8oSXmXFvSwtJea5peECYcBSUz9zRqW=NH7gvKFQN+EFBhSJw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.4 (3.28.4-1.fc28)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/iXTg7_MiLwv29JIuvJejSKSoQ9w>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:13:43 -0000
On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 15:05 -0700, Christopher Wood wrote: > The sense of the TLS@IETF102 room was that the WG should adopt > draft-housley-tls-tls13-cert-with-extern-psk as a WG item. This email > is to confirm this sense on list. If you would like for this draft to > become a WG document and you are willing to review it as it moves > through the process, then please let the list know by 2359UTC > 20180809. If you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say > so (and say why). Would it make sense to communicate the reasons of adopting this document by the WG?
- [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls13-c… Christopher Wood
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls… Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls… Russ Housley
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls… Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
- Re: [TLS] WG adoption call: draft-housley-tls-tls… Christopher Wood