[TLS] Two Multi-CDN proposals

Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com> Wed, 27 February 2019 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <christopherwood07@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9024C130FF0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:18:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXc_Csoiufsr for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc35.google.com (mail-yw1-xc35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B80DA1200B3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc35.google.com with SMTP id v201so8517076ywa.9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:18:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YtiTG7OsAjcDXUuhfmoLYaQNF47FPXl5vLFTVuoRFZg=; b=gm0URsij2pyEoqaUin1hnJjD534zHiALzdYGW1V9lNCQnOrXN/lm9jin4rXT9t4x57 tOZKF5yOYaEUZcBkcuMyYjn9yoPZYCpM4+h7GUmQWIa1vXku3+Og5dUBHbUOS8geg0n0 +FVaBbatUBEzhs68fdBscnSo01sfsIZ1/DyM3tePbCKjrBPRSA2XXVSW+IynZghbpAVD r/cDoHagA4gjDUq+8S/K6pyW4cIxxf7VB5nu8d9TYrd/GG0iSyZwMWQrhgNn4ZKgYx1D l9M4H3TJmXe6/utRwVeVfaSssaOD2LJZtoyzJbwmzdMp9krnVYYqQZtnvGhAkEeBCspk Z8jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=YtiTG7OsAjcDXUuhfmoLYaQNF47FPXl5vLFTVuoRFZg=; b=XMaqeupO8irqB7wR3u2oFPja5bpLmckGIBd+U1MFXl46Gg3i5PgFs5npbC/lXV+Tc8 wdiSbwkO1uCrh5K6uhCH/nm3y0EnS/CObcuivg8fyJmvMUS8Zd0PoiVPZ9rEux6buXmE 1jN82+qL4t1fs21bXfhCKi+1PEFj+cW0KGroqcl6EXdT0nhfaQmeVc2W7Xa9cun8YNlL 4KPUqPjYUiUEVnwtRiUsxgL8qlvICKUZsBGsZS3E3jNTpiZSjQEo12OtKlDCLV5DSiwy eUtXy+5DutXCnB3gDlAaXIuT1KrokZ5H73lTKSNq9sWeNiO0AxKOcoN9OXbboId7ithU WjNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZgQhnUsPqZGAn+P3spfnOwPzUhzzPNdmqJS1H+SvLjHOxcU5+G z9leVAMhzwYajGwuIzF+CBswCWHZBGTUXMOaTF01EJqZb7k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYVw0lfCvKk7HGsSefE2+JdmBbFC9O1lC6MMEC7512ssCUih86iHPGDaJytYHaB7YaevomWeax8IiXeW7G78b4=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:83c1:: with SMTP id t184mr1811259ywf.350.1551284319502; Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:18:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Christopher Wood <christopherwood07@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:18:28 -0800
Message-ID: <CAO8oSX=sPoLo78oX4qEEyeuck7CxM_uAqYPHEsY7BuYqBUaorg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/l-80SOYLLqckzsoVOFsFahAMk7w>
Subject: [TLS] Two Multi-CDN proposals
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:18:43 -0000

Hi folks,

Below are two PRs that seek to address the multi-CDN issue discussed
on this list and in meetings:

   1. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/136
   2. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/137

#136 implements the combined or stapled record approach discussed
several times, most recently in [1]. It includes these via an ESNIKeys
extension. #137 builds on this design with a mechanism that lets
clients detect and recover from A/AAAA and ESNI mismatch (if desired).
It is certainly more complex in several respects. A third variant,
which is not (yet) in PR form, is a simplification of #137 wherein
ESNIKeys addresses are only used as filters, instead of filters *or*
complete addresses.

We are asking for feedback on these PRs, as we would like to merge one
of them for the next draft version. As #136 is simpler and permits
extensibility, that is the current preference.

Thanks in advance for your feedback.

Best,
Chris (no hat, on behalf of the authors)

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/WXrPgaIsIPItDw3IQthmJk9VRlw