[TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6347 (5026)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 31 May 2017 09:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48B3129510 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 02:32:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N_Qx3yJxsCkk for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2017 02:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BC0C12950B for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2017 02:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 25429B81436; Wed, 31 May 2017 02:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: ekr@rtfm.com, nagendra@cs.stanford.edu, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, joe@salowey.net, sean+ietf@sn3rd.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: korte@easycrypt.de, tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20170531093217.25429B81436@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 02:32:17 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/lnElUOFQqdpNpOh-iRUPbbwny88>
Subject: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6347 (5026)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 09:32:39 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6347, "Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5026 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Timm Korte <korte@easycrypt.de> Section: 4.1 Original Text ------------- length Identical to the length field in a TLS 1.2 record. As in TLS 1.2, the length should not exceed 2^14. Corrected Text -------------- length Identical to the length field in a TLS 1.2 record. As in TLS 1.2, the length MUST NOT exceed 2^14. Notes ----- The originial comment on length in RFC 5246, 6.2.1 is: length The length (in bytes) of the following TLSPlaintext.fragment. The length MUST NOT exceed 2^14. so it has to be "MUST NOT" - instead of "should not" as currently stated. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6347 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2 Publication Date : January 2012 Author(s) : E. Rescorla, N. Modadugu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6347 (5026) RFC Errata System