[TLS] PR#1093: server_certificate_type
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 14 November 2017 05:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8615D128D69 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p95xiH1tDDOM for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53FE6124B0A for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v41so22862981qtv.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hOLRNV3Xl7e9Rn+p5gvIJDUlWbnGe4pMUQUpaiAWS/o=; b=rB/1t+psEzzuzEzdLSukxmIviCpiXKQR2zAaq809NcsSXOgnsL8oB/EnS1braX1Gqk TkWA/C7kbcBLeuPOWgB8AGbMnlTKMSRr0KUJsRvpcHyTmcuB/IclJUiwcTXSnMlI/53O EtmcIVqUl5rFZBXvVDU8QOsgJm/fcaIhcYh/OXmBwykxrfC11vqQjMqgjVIB+qb46XsX aEgk3JqyrfTyavVFzjT2mIBy921XMUIDaxNi0mpMc3jMEWBZeGCYdu/tkXl3wW9xSbVP bzUqR+pjd41Af3aThfIYPuSrpc51wj9yYHnsStbxF6ayImIc8dUa0uU0ygaafu184P0u duwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hOLRNV3Xl7e9Rn+p5gvIJDUlWbnGe4pMUQUpaiAWS/o=; b=Dq3xw7YGqB3ZQVHklarGFTjgtM8P8jEMUjzBS4ORujqY05ReSvBebyB3/d3s3fKPhC p82Ne5W5W293V3Vz0CcAIrG1fBXPOaGtB1OSDe+0Vuf9AcAW1UANJPMYBFW+/kFWE77V YnBLSpw8shhUYS6BxpdtFq5MI36VkWHgfkwjI0lTYpeqIEnHdtT5gnn+mqak2KuFL/eB FqpCen5VlLj5+oy5Pyer3JCoftMx9rsDebs67mafMa2SuiJ94HFRZSQLeMIEacaSocJ4 yI9XfG/bhW5JoQLiEoKhHGs3NoiNLtu+yFPJ2wPTEIcc1CrAmFmyoZJekIXxHqUTeGo1 QvyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6MnyKfQbboVBnTnpZW3suBtQxmVlk8wZ9+8HcaD5DJmcTbXUKT dODdod2MACR4n7IxyJyElUspe4zNYDtNv+R/WAvLgFtT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYlxL6cUE7TtzRTh6RRGATPcPgv9DDbFKBvymYMZKIq8dhTeB1eca1RR5XqeRjAwNhadThhsI3E8CrOlbl53jA=
X-Received: by 10.129.114.10 with SMTP id n10mr7133619ywc.327.1510638602187; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:50:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.61.12 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:49:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:49:21 +0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBN2Dc=sTUwDDuUTwH+PyXVOe8r6rU_3vFQ4rZ6WdH-ekQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11473894448cae055deaf5e7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/oMBIKiJK05ux7jFFbpYV8MpnZsY>
Subject: [TLS] PR#1093: server_certificate_type
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 05:50:04 -0000
In Prague, we discussed moving server_certificate_type to EE, so that all the certificates in the server's Certificate message had to be of the same type. I don't think anyone objected and this is implemented in PR#1093. I don't plan to discuss this on Thursday. Unless someone objects, I'll just merge this and it will be in -22. -Ekr
- [TLS] PR#1093: server_certificate_type Eric Rescorla