Re: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 07 October 2017 15:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D97134937 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0nAhVab9WeHm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC685134936 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x54so36346831qth.12 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BBxkyQlyE7YC5Zes330Upyhe5Ljdt4PutpGdS33Ld88=; b=ll65uLfYWUFnEKXGV3HmYVGWY/SqzE23xRwO9Wtbp+9mRd3QM+qaAxW7+MHplEInOp O3En2nPQFhyXhCTOIYqEmQXCAMFWgqgHG6aHmquHWa6bml5TkVEy1zppOrCVP3+7ebhM MM7BXUfWcv9ZOXX14604wvz9fM3PckJ+cV8p9RCnVFdIpGp1/yuTCpX+vDC7gTv/ZySG j/n9/w8ATO4nSjBS0x54q5ZttZH4jhgpRvRHSIEuuZo7L75W1nBf5PE2lUEnE8BPh3Y4 vZAGIT9cHWr4dgl0RD3lVJ7o3M/1eYEmpuC8syH+dB5lGmKTaISPpz22uIk6MOjQFWGT W7qw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BBxkyQlyE7YC5Zes330Upyhe5Ljdt4PutpGdS33Ld88=; b=QnGgFWPL3NsGraAcPmKlHN951DUUiZnMOIFErbEJfTwvEAoPanFt5mp+FQhoTtYJv6 x/oFzxiQoh1/rvAYoCQPOlaFa4wgw/0ZQFrlnj5q7u290EnfAcTkaXFLlAMZQDPCxNXS gq0SbiR7eyVDG1HPXHFwUL6DNwHptu7h2ZvCVfHN4yA4WVHT56QZHG87tD12KxT/ziq8 u1mcBUqlDN/LpE9vzEfNKhOZ49cNfooUCjh+0tc9XpahhxGFv+cZ5e5dqXpvsgRnnqpC q7ralemeBBoAfKEKnXNZPnf32IaTXhFLpx7T8uT6qsMMCbqYOJ4U7U4El1kwlki6eNZG JYOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVlcmZSlc0GWLW3VUHKFkbOMy1Uxc3N5aE8af4Axld2LAt9RO7M Ejb9BzvCawBAjVyzdpxEzcdAC2AbVv4UHgexVHLzqg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QC+D3cP/0sq87yEElQMaI30AGaAovgen9CMEio9dsigT1Q+zvdJ8n6Od43xjG8tCuHmYTQwk9sFWBfy0bhGRnE=
X-Received: by 10.37.83.66 with SMTP id h63mr470031ybb.397.1507390575967; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 08:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.75.194 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C7396C83-9F02-4BF8-B490-4EA8DB9798B1@akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBMoW8B78C5UmLqAim4X=jQ8jVRYTP-L7RVnU3AScdFvFw@mail.gmail.com> <EAD84CE1-41A9-40FE-B882-18F077FFD691@akamai.com> <17791E16-1E12-4E8E-A098-31E961C2B2CB@gmail.com> <CAOjisRx9rwtbwBOTB+PegrKim2Q3bDmwbZi6KAu0aFMEaYSxRw@mail.gmail.com> <A6896A64-A0B3-409A-ABC2-1EF1D7DD0E7D@akamai.com> <CAL02cgQc2UriU7EZzpYpdxMrj15fDrfsD3adS0TeqhTe8ZEcBA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBP9sqG6sHEdN1hLj4_gT7qQM9vAnhGussrUwkaFO+gciA@mail.gmail.com> <C7396C83-9F02-4BF8-B490-4EA8DB9798B1@akamai.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 08:35:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPdLEAwhk_0YWjZjKk4L3yQ-BHy0LzQE6r49HN=b55UiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e688ed191b6055af6b73c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/p86GjzpEWkHGtaPwIy7WK6OEkFg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Update on TLS 1.3 Middlebox Issues
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:36:18 -0000

On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>; wrote:

>
>
> > I suggest we not have this debate now. We'll have a lot more data
> towards the end of the month and we can have an informed discussion then.
>
>
>
>
>
> That is what I am asking for.  More information so that the entire WG can
> make an informed decision.
>

I didn't intend to be arguing with you. I'm happy to present what I have in
Singapore and while I can't speak for others, I expect they would be as
well.

-Ekr


> And I was only laying out an option that does not seem to have been
> considered before.
>