[TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6347 (3917)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 14 March 2014 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A331A01F4 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bjfEhc9xrfgR for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F59E1A01EC for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id AA0EA7FC179; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:06:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: ekr@rtfm.com, nagendra@cs.stanford.edu, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, jsalowey@cisco.com, ekr@rtfm.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140314220655.AA0EA7FC179@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 15:06:55 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/pQc39NBolyFkHkWdkppMOvC3s4Q
Cc: tls@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6347 (3917)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:07:05 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6347, "Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6347&eid=3917 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Section: 4.2.1 Original Text ------------- struct { ProtocolVersion client_version; Random random; SessionID session_id; opaque cookie<0..2^8-1>; // New field CipherSuite cipher_suites<2..2^16-1>; CompressionMethod compression_methods<1..2^8-1>; } ClientHello; Corrected Text -------------- struct { ProtocolVersion client_version; Random random; SessionID session_id; opaque cookie<0..2^8-1>; // New field CipherSuite cipher_suites<2..2^16-1>; CompressionMethod compression_methods<1..2^8-1>; select (extensions_present) { case false: struct {}; case true: Extension extensions<0..2^16-1>; }; } ClientHello; Notes ----- This also affects Section 4.3.2 where the same structure is repeated. Extensions are a part of TLS. They are also part of DTLS in practice, but the RFC omits them. The corrected text includes the relevant part of the ClientHello from RFC 5246. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6347 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis-06) -------------------------------------- Title : Datagram Transport Layer Security Version 1.2 Publication Date : January 2012 Author(s) : E. Rescorla, N. Modadugu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Transport Layer Security Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [TLS] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6347 (3917) RFC Errata System