[TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)
Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 April 2018 02:52 UTC
Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736B31270A3; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 19:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-record-limit@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, tls-chairs@ietf.org, sean@sn3rd.com, tls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.77.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152272392244.13963.7326437515101111372.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 19:52:02 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/sKdW8QVOqVot9_RxWgn-ylmI1b0>
Subject: [TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 02:52:02 -0000
Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-record-limit/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a nit, but just to make sure … The "record_size_limit" extension replaces the "max_fragment_length" extension [RFC6066]. A server that supports the "record_size_limit" extension MUST ignore and "max_fragment_length" that appears in a ^^^ the "and" should be "any", shouldn't it? ClientHello if both extensions appear. A client MUST treat receipt of both "max_fragment_length" and "record_size_limit" as a fatal error, and SHOULD generate an "illegal_parameter" alert.
- [TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [TLS] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-… Martin Thomson