[TLS] Draft 18 review : Message order
Olivier Levillain <olivier.levillain@ssi.gouv.fr> Tue, 22 November 2016 19:05 UTC
Return-Path: <olivier.levillain@ssi.gouv.fr>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F897129683 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:05:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_FAIL=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rCf66uFjRl9t for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from garfield.picty.org (garfield.picty.org [82.231.235.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44852129B21 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neoplankton.picty.org (unknown [80.12.39.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by garfield.picty.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 62A5E54275 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:08:09 +0100
From: Olivier Levillain <olivier.levillain@ssi.gouv.fr>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20161122190758.GG19978@neoplankton.picty.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/sinvJwN8wF1zNBu2X6xhws_WUTs>
Subject: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message order
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 19:05:30 -0000
Hi list, I am sorry for the very late answer concerning draft 18, but we (ANSSI) have several remarks after proof-reading the current specification. We are sorry for the multiple long messages. If the WG is interested by some of our concerns/proposals, we would be glad to propose some PRs. = Message order = I believe the message P.27 section 4 is important, but not sufficient. As already expressed on the list, a formal automaton should be provided in the spec. I think Ekr said there was some work in progress in this area. Is this a goal for the final specification? Olivier Levillain
- [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message order Olivier Levillain
- Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message order Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] Draft 18 review : Message order Olivier Levillain