IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] TLS DNSSEC chain consensus text, please speak up...

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net> Wed, 16 May 2018 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C3D120724 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4X4bELwIUsb for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B981241F5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id e1-v6so986469pga.6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nomountain-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MAV54btbH+RIQk/nHAhVvDotYEPgYUvMjB8nf/9csck=; b=XV0k5R3aa2QQ9Z+YTl0Lnwb34z8VzgJ+VWYBgtR1aJ7IH0zmpA5BN0wuvrVHOrbFtl og80qq82XuQ4lVbO4hH+q4eLGAltMrRNuq5/O6uzBfIHMHbLeKPnnkBosPgbVeqpi3OI bF/ktbjv9L1HFSYYt5txyA4JZAlLa4N11XLq0Y0I7kmHZM5OHFqIFafJ0N8T1DUydNID 6KzTW+5wlUb0L3sUg3M/rVgnNrsyWkRKkbwvb2kluu8mLqP4b/h9iHOF0G6U5uPlCHhP VuSuynggcgDEyNL7Ib1EMLOYETQuzWsELzGK0p2+Ds9lLJdhdosx+aPmF3TTUXZH+twy IKSA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MAV54btbH+RIQk/nHAhVvDotYEPgYUvMjB8nf/9csck=; b=jZevIlBceqrVMkehcOpZCRRHvjqLYBBWYskGSkTic9nJxB0gfCk1TD97JzEex7pF5/ fpIit1jjySBU7Ju5ARKyiIxM5dl1Pls+QMAueVLFZjgt6WYl8t6LcsgdYsXm7sr2DGg3 ZfGPR31PBBgj8+bP6X3lJ0xIkPZl4hire6D5tBDi+3QoDUxP8kuryvqncCp7xqwsWlDb JLEEr21nfVQdhvjYR12J8WjZMyaT1WugebwDq0dboTcgZ1fLm8k/OCefX+quPMCms3f+ 4fe4b2bC8Ok0axw047a6nKliQRWvMWpE9U4Gbj/hds2Q/eKReN8uPwXaM/30X8+rCJfp UCrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwe26FBrXJw1LOf9LHl8ZG1Lr+B4H0B1ikeQIc8zRgEgNTguSc9r 3fb4+8G9iQpebIXG3fGmD+lB7oE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZof72M/xSTEQxW+Q2MLd61i3mCQa55f2r+dURHQJQKrhr3ypepe+70xckrhGQqK2S1VT6bSlQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:4549:: with SMTP id x9-v6mr12808622pgr.158.1526443729155; Tue, 15 May 2018 21:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aspen.local (63-140-93-6-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [63.140.93.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u10-v6sm1410941pgp.32.2018.05.15.21.08.47 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 May 2018 21:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <5E208416-CC05-4CA0-91A4-680045823E82@dukhovni.org>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@nomountain.net>
Message-ID: <795f96a1-e2b2-6a89-555c-c856d07838cf@nomountain.net>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 20:08:46 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5E208416-CC05-4CA0-91A4-680045823E82@dukhovni.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/u7c9DekdgwwUuMRelSDDCPi-oo8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] TLS DNSSEC chain consensus text, please speak up...
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 04:08:53 -0000

We've had this discussion already, at terrific length.

To my knowledge it's still the case that nobody intends
to implement the proposed changes, and it's still the
case that should there be interest in implementing the
new functionality there's the option of a new extension.

At any rate this is starting to feel like abuse of process.

Melinda

-- 
Software longa, hardware brevis

PGP fingerprint: 4F68 2D93 2A17 96F8 20F2
                 34C0 DFB8 9172 9A76 DB8F

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email