Re: [TLS] PR#1091: Changes to provide middlebox robustness

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Tue, 07 November 2017 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572A0129B16 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:41:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NHdl3mVPPAlv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49BEC129B06 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 15:41:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA7NbNGD007116; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:41:55 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=PYwKwvNlD02tjz+20fJlBWp9l1nvEX1Z/hUQx1AUkLU=; b=OLv9rIzN1PsT4eqSezgaxeklCKJBqv2sArNX0zHOx3BBsX+xx0lUkr4nd0x8dJil3AeE p+8MBSMQAQrixAKSrDAmIAfEWL5cSlnGZMpoxjuDgJblCK+f2du1/706sK0iCLjy8hnw uPxonCV51wzEH/QRaQjbJo27+R5BIGco0ESFmILK5yUM8y1J+rWBMRwknVaYcfOK2ODD LHAnmEvfkZIwGJfomYaH39jvym5uMTWURHZ3Qjeip7gzwhOlcWEgJY9vmgYP0zvKOPwT Wmo+Xamx4aRfcZA2RVPJz2lLY1EMmK3SAnfBP7Z/xAFv0cdStlUtJBCbG6LzdrLQ2SIc 1w==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [184.51.33.19]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2e15pr5adn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:41:54 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id vA7Neak8021853; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:41:53 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2e18vubbhj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 07 Nov 2017 18:41:53 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:41:52 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Tue, 7 Nov 2017 18:41:52 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] PR#1091: Changes to provide middlebox robustness
Thread-Index: AQHTVyvYee7TW4xp9E6OP50HN76KZ6MJYqeAgAAba4CAAA8EgIAAJQeAgAAbmgCAABu7gA==
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 23:41:51 +0000
Message-ID: <D517CEA4-AF57-4F87-9D66-4A2D0299ED17@akamai.com>
References: <CABcZeBNm4bEMx0L6Kx-v7R+Tog9WLXxQLwTwjutapRWWW_x9+w@mail.gmail.com> <4406543.RZChgRkkf9@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <CABcZeBOxEAVUAq6+cSD9P+e0VHvgJHvrgj6uENbvf9aWnZooKg@mail.gmail.com> <6818962.9GzJR6rN5C@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <965B995B-A5B3-4322-B13A-A2D82AFD2743@akamai.com> <CABkgnnWt4NYuGKOoCfH3x6oSHXbC90ubJM64ArYiNG+9qhXQWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWt4NYuGKOoCfH3x6oSHXbC90ubJM64ArYiNG+9qhXQWw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.27.0.171010
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.42.204]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <455C799C1701074187D3756A26363155@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-11-07_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1711070310
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-11-07_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1707230000 definitions=main-1711070309
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/uFRa5a-YfB_35XA1nDmdb7NPkFQ>
Subject: Re: [TLS] PR#1091: Changes to provide middlebox robustness
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2017 23:41:58 -0000

➢ Given that we're almost there, and that only really browsers are
    asking for these hacks, and that even some of those were almost ready
    to ship without these hacks, I don't think that this is entirely
    unrealistic as an aspiration.
    
The Internet is more than just a couple of browser executables.

Does nobody think of the servers?