Re: [TLS] TLS Digest, Vol 46, Issue 4

["Hasnaa Moustafa" <[e-mail]>]

I have read the draft-badra-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm-02. I think that there
is no significant issues that need consideration in this phase of the draft.

I just have a small comment concerning the 2nd table of section 3.2: the
following could be added,

CipherSuite MAC PRF

TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA256 HMAC-SHA-256 P_SHA-256

TLS_DHE_PSK_WITH_NULL_SHA384 HMAC-SHA-384 P_SHA-384
Kind regards,
Hassnaa Moustafa


Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 5 May 2008 14:17:35 +0200 (CEST)
> From: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [TLS] ?draft-badra-tls-psk-new-mac-aes-gcm as WG item
>        (was: RE: Re:??TLS?document?status?update )
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail], [e-mail], [e-mail],
>        [e-mail]
> Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
>
> Dear Pasi,
>
> >> Since the document is based and heavily borrows from
> >> draft-ietf-tls-ecc-new-mac and draft-ietf-tls-rsa-aes-gcm, I would
> >> like to request that the TLS WG adopts this document as a WG item.
> >
> > Comments from TLS WG members? (E.g., volunteers who promise to
> > contribute text during the document's development)
> >
> > (To take this as a WG item, we actually need a *group* of people
> > willing to work on this.)
>
> I asked for volunteers to contribute text during the document
> devecopement, and I received promises from:
>
> Pascal Urien, [e-mail]
> Alfred Hines, [e-mail]
> Hassnaa Moustafa, [e-mail]
>
> I hope other WG members are willing to work on that document.
>
> Best regards,
> Badra
>
>

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls