Re: [TLS] Artart early review of draft-ietf-tls-wkech-04

[Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>]

Short inline comments.

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, at 23:24, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> [...]
> I'm not really sure how to interpret the above tbh. Was that intended
> as a summary of the draft or as a synopsis of the problem space?

That's my sketch of what I think the draft should be doing.  I don't know if it truly does that, for the reasons stated elsewhere.

> Happy to document the validation more, but the basic idea is that the
> ZF checks ECH works, and if it does, then the ZF is ok to re-publish.
> If anyone has ideas on other kinds of checks that'd be sensible, be
> happy to consider incorporating those.

>From my perspective, I'm looking to understand first what the ZK is expected to be responsible for, at the layer you describe here.  Then I would also like to see a description of how it might achieve that more concretely.  You get most of the way there, I think, but it needs to be a bit more thorough.


>> Titles are not sentences.  Lose the period.
>
> Where? (Sorry, not sure, but the RFC editor will fix anyway
> so no worries.)

The title of the document.

> Given all the above, it's probably fine if you wait 'till there's a
> -05 done before we chat more, (assuming you have time), but happy to
> discuss via email in the meantime too of course.

I look forward to it.