IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Drip] 64bit comments on draft-moskowitz-drip-uas-rid-06.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 15 September 2020 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B533A0D41 for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDGq_K9q4GlO for <tm-rid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B4963A0D39 for <tm-rid@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA95B3899B; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id VihKFPfvhl72; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:103c:9eff:fecb:2eac]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF6A389A3; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 16:50:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2080D50C; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Stuart W. Card" <stu.card@axenterprize.com>, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>, tm-rid@ietf.org, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <daf71327-527d-f9cd-fc36-448ece888ca8@axenterprize.com>
References: <a43152a8-e2ca-4f66-3bf4-0fc502187b4a@gmail.com> <f275925c-c561-22df-3044-65719fa947fc@labs.htt-consult.com> <e88a5e4b-2c45-1b14-9ad0-1a4fa3b7d7e6@axenterprize.com> <609d2928-031a-ff7b-5660-200dca3cb7db@labs.htt-consult.com> <CAKM0pYMMRVcz=cTGe5X8ocJZCW9nHdS3G0vGpPK6UBrntepmqQ@mail.gmail.com> <552fdb67-82c4-b208-075a-fb24bc4b31ab@labs.htt-consult.com> <9617a055-20f5-718d-ac0f-8b66966cff9b@labs.htt-consult.com> <16737.1600200174@localhost> <daf71327-527d-f9cd-fc36-448ece888ca8@axenterprize.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:11:35 -0400
Message-ID: <31958.1600204295@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tm-rid/bBDC4RfZMRFtuX2P-oFPzCYf1Sg>
Subject: Re: [Drip] 64bit comments on draft-moskowitz-drip-uas-rid-06.txt
X-BeenThere: tm-rid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Drone Remote Identification Protocol <tm-rid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tm-rid/>
List-Post: <mailto:tm-rid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid>, <mailto:tm-rid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:11:41 -0000

Stuart W. Card <stu.card@axenterprize.com> wrote:
    > Data retention time for UAS RID and UTM proposed by US FAA is exactly 6
    > months, not a day less, not a day more (they have been pretty emphatic
    > on that balance between privacy and needs of law enforcement).

okay.
In my mind, the HHIT would be in DNS for the ~2 months until the HHIT is
purged.  Then it would be removed from public view, but that doesn't mean it
has to be deleted.

If you are saying that LEA is screwed if they don't serve a warrant within
six months, then I'm surprised by that, but okay. That still fits in my
timeline, and it still isn't 2yrs.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email