Re: [Drip] call for adoption for draft-ietf-drip-uas-rid

[Alexandre Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

I understand there might have been an issue in the process.

I do not oppose this.

But I would like to say that I make comments here only for the pleasure 
of the technicalities.  I do not build myself drones, I do not fly them, 
I do not make them communicate myself.

I also feel that there is pressure for this to move onwards.  I think 
all other comments I might have about the feasibility, about tinkering 
with potential implementations and about - why not - potential 
alternatives, might be rejected straight.

It is for this reason that I have doubts about continuing to 
participate, or not.

If one thinks this is the best way to go, there could be faster tracks: 
an INFORMATIONAL track, a sponsored track by an AD, and why not 
publishing faster without necessarily going through a WG discussion.

Finally, I re-iterate: I do not oppose this.

Alex

Le 09/09/2020 à 20:39, Alexandre Petrescu a écrit :
> excuse me but that's already a WG item? (has ietf in filename?)
> 
> not sure...
> 
> Le 09/09/2020 à 19:04, Daniel Migault a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> This email starts a call for adoption for draft-ietf-drip-uas-rid 
>> available here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-drip-uas-rid/
>>
>> The call for adoption ends on 2020 September 23.  Please state clearly 
>> your opinion whether you think the work should be adopted or not. If 
>> you think the work should not be adopted, please state why.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Med and Daniel
>> -- 
>> Daniel Migault
>> Ericsson
>>
>