Re: [Tm-rid] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on charter-ietf-drip-00-01: (with COMMENT)

["Wiethuechter, Adam" <[e-mail]>]

This (the second point) is mentioning that the UAS Identifier has its own
set of constraints and properties that it must hold - defined and regulated
by parties outside the IETF. For example UAS IDs are constrained to 20
bytes.

So the requirements documents produced by the WG will also specify other
identifiers, created new or adapted from an existing protocol (this is
exactly with the HHITs are from HIP), that conform and meet the
specifications to be certified as a UAS ID.

Probably not the exact words to use, but I think it clears up the confusion?

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:48 PM Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Any taker to answer Alissa's second point ? about what is the subject (see
> below) ?
>
> I would have loved to finalize the charter this week and this is the only
> open point left before approval
>
> -éric
>
> On 20/02/2020, 10:28, "Tm-rid on behalf of Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <
> [e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>     Alissa and Ben,
>
>     Thank you for your comments and let's work to fix all ambiguities...
>
>     TM-RID list members can you please comment on Alissa & Ben's reviews ?
>     - Alissa: we need to expand UAS as "Unmanned Aircraft System" at first
> use even if only to avoid being ambiguous
>     - Alissa: what is the subject of the "need to": is it "these
> requirements" or "those associated to the UAS identifier" or "UAS
> identifier", let's be clear on this
>     - Ben: indeed milestone are quite optimistic... adoption should be
> target and request for publication 6 month later ?
>     - Ben: should RID be trustworthy (my guess is yes of course as this is
> the main purpose of this group)
>
>     The DRIP charter will be reviewed today at 15H00 UTC, so, a prompt
> reply from the proponents of the list will be appreciated
>
>     -éric
>
>     On 20/02/2020, 06:10, "Tm-rid on behalf of Alissa Cooper via
> Datatracker" <[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>         Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
>         charter-ietf-drip-00-01: No Objection
>
>         When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> all
>         email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this
>         introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
>         The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-drip/
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>         COMMENT:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         Two questions about this:
>
>         "* Requirements: the WG is expected to provide an informational
> document that
>         lists the technical requirements for applying IETF protocols to
> the UAS Remote
>         Identification (UAS RID) - that is the system for identifying UA
> during flight
>         by other parties. These requirements will also include those
> associated to the
>         UAS Identifier that need to both meet some constraints as well as
> some specific
>         properties."
>
>         Is UA distinct from UAS?
>
>         The last sentence doesn't parse properly for me. What is the
> subject of "need
>         to"? Is this saying "requirements ... need to ... meet some
> constraints ...
>         [and meet] some specific properties"? What does that mean?
>
>
>         --
>         Tm-rid mailing list
>         [e-mail]
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid
>
>
>     --
>     Tm-rid mailing list
>     [e-mail]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid
>
>
> --
> Tm-rid mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid
>


-- 
73's,
Adam T. Wiethuechter
AX Enterprize, LLC