IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Two topics for next week's tools call (both probably need IESG input)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 29 November 2018 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03377130E4C for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:30:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ry_GhhDJGTeT for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEDF6130E47 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 10:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.18.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wATIUOqe045032 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:30:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.18.66] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <e75459dc-a976-635c-fc51-155670228496@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:30:23 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/1iq-H-54VNoeJypbrtae9fumDuU>
Subject: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Two topics for next week's tools call (both probably need IESG input)
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 18:30:27 -0000

The mentoring team has asked for a new standalone set of tools to 
facilitate their work. This is not something that would be part of the 
datatracker, at least not initially. See 
<https://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/ticket/2622>. I think the 
tools team needs direction from the IESG on whether to take this on, and 
how to prioritize it against other outstanding requests.

We also continue to run into issues with sending reviews "From" the 
reviewer rather than the datatracker. IESG ballot position emails 
(discusses) have this same problem. We would like to consider moving to 
a From value that says "the datatracker on behalf of person X". I think 
we need the IESGs input on this change.

RjS

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email