Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW
"Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 06 July 2016 20:03 UTC
Return-Path: <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C14312D62D for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJ9WyH64cCnn for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5814B12B040 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2071E5D67 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DvTJDiGUoUEs for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro.local (c-50-135-43-191.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [50.135.43.191]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B75331E5D61 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <C67A7147-8A55-4E68-8B81-2CC2586D85A1@vigilsec.com> <424bc5bb-d32a-d823-54aa-df1f69a3e238@rfc-editor.org> <54BC881A-0B9C-4553-8433-1FB1DADA4E9F@vigilsec.com> <AFE01F67-9610-471E-8458-83B67A212B5E@vigilsec.com> <9b5087f8-8cee-37ee-83d0-77eac13b54da@greenbytes.de> <70427794-113A-4F61-835E-66F5441E4353@vigilsec.com> <27cad5c3-5437-1fb2-3379-b94b1c810176@greenbytes.de> <e70d5df9-f303-1695-9917-78597732caf5@rfc-editor.org> <0cd2457c-7e44-87de-7280-e6f2b81226bb@nostrum.com> <B201EADB-A4AE-45EB-9A93-33DF136E11C4@att.com>
From: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <a075fbba-439f-a8a1-f38f-83e0bb3bf414@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:03:03 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B201EADB-A4AE-45EB-9A93-33DF136E11C4@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------9FEB208A6159D0F052063376"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/5Fv2IX7ZMlCCh-5z-KdFlj6wNJY>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 20:03:06 -0000
That's essentially what we have here. I don't think, however, that calling it a "Look and Feel for RFCs RFP" will get the right bidders in the room. -Heather On 7/5/16 2:14 PM, HANSEN, TONY L wrote: > > This discussion makes me think that what we need is NOT a “CSS for > RFCs” SOW, but instead a “Look&Feel for RFCs” SOW that covers both > “CSS for HTML” and “PDF”. > > > > Tony > > > > *From: *TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT <tools-development-bounces@ietf.org> on > behalf of Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> > *Date: *Tuesday, July 5, 2016 at 4:07 PM > *To: *"tools-development@ietf.org" <tools-development@ietf.org> > *Subject: *Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW > > > > On 7/5/16 2:56 PM, Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor) wrote: > > <trim/> > > > > > >>> - it's unclear how designing the CSS has any impact on PDF, > >>> unless we plan to produce the PDF from HTML (which I would >>> > strongly support), in which case mentioning it here doesn't make > >>> a lot of sense >> >> The > > most recent update to the CSS for RFCs SOW is much more clear >> > on this point. I think the previous version was fuzzy. > > I just > looked and it still talks about PDF all over the place; it's > > totally unclear from the SoW how CSS affects PDF. > > > The HTML and PDF need to look very similar, and if the > implementer(s) decide to create the PDF from the HTML using all > the features described in the PDF draft, then there may well be > implications for the CSS. I feel rather strongly that we need to > leave the mentions of PDF in this doc. Whoever designs the CSS > needs to understand how closely these things will be tied together. > > It's probably worth capturing the distinction I think Julian is really > looking for. > > The CSS designer needs to be aware that we want to create PDF that > looks very similar to the way HTML renders. > That will constrain the choices the designer makes to those that won't > make creating that PDF _hard_. > The CSS designer should also be aware that we could choose to render > PDF from the HTML, and not make choices that would make that hard. > > That captures the connection between the HTML and PDF for the purposes > of this document completely I think. > > > > _______________________________________________ > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list > TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW HANSEN, TONY L
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Robert Sparks
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 July 2… Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Julian Reschke
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Robert Sparks
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] CSS for RFCs SOW Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Tools Call Agenda -- 5 Ju… Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)