IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Planning of the SoW for YangCatalog ?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 17 January 2019 19:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AE5130EC8 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:21:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nkjRwqhZ0EvR for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68B3130E72 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 11:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.39.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0HJL1ua029851 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:21:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1547752862; bh=sGQRk7yy8O/6ai2/rLs8D1W/Q2kDVvvHcIFL9AVGh7Q=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=oGc56XX+zZHLEU5e6OW3tt32p8H4FhHIMX1evs5Qnj0dkzACX+oYkhsXhx0A/Gx5p qyF4cnHEwDyIF0vGhJ1yGUseNu5HB6brzHkjo4VeVspneP3hNgMIUf5GO5brpBAi+o dHE2fvod40A6XsfQLW33Xkww0svCNGuzh3ytRy58=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.39.7] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
References: <72C337CC-B9C8-4933-9117-AA59828FCAEA@cisco.com> <e0314737-4f57-74d4-21b7-baa51b5a3e69@nostrum.com> <A93515EC-E5CC-494B-AF32-2B3B17935001@cisco.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <e5c3cb0e-bda2-c847-39ee-86b1eab2e312@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 13:21:01 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <A93515EC-E5CC-494B-AF32-2B3B17935001@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BD35CF5BDFAD8CC2B5FBE637"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/Re59ZcsW7P4osawDBtEkGm9oync>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Planning of the SoW for YangCatalog ?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 19:21:09 -0000

One thing potentially:

Are the current known yangcatalog bugs all in the github issue tracker? 
Or are some of them still in a private issue tracker?

I think they all have to be in github, some other public place, or 
explicitly listed in this SoW in order for potential contractors to 
reasonably prepare a bid.

RjS

On 1/17/19 12:40 PM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>
> Excellent 😊Do you need anything more from me ?
>
> *From: *TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT <tools-development-bounces@ietf.org> on 
> behalf of Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 10:03
> *To: *IETF Tools Development <tools-development@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] Planning of the SoW for YangCatalog ?
>
> HI Eric  -
>
> I hope to have something to the list to review today (tomorrow at the 
> latest).
>
> RjS
>
> On 1/17/19 11:45 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>
>     Dear all,
>
>     The original plan was to transfer the Yang Catalog to the IETF
>     around January 2019 and start the operation by the IETF tools team
>     at the same time.
>
>     Where are we regarding the issue of CFT about the SoW (I know that
>     Robert is working on them) ? This appears to be the last thing to
>     be executed before the transfer as the ‘actual’ transfer of code
>     and data to the AMSL VM is done.
>
>     Regards
>
>     -éric
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT mailing list
>
>     TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org  <mailto:TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT@ietf.org>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email