Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] "For Action"?
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Thu, 23 September 2010 16:02 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tools-development@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52323A69C1 for <tools-development@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.306
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.306 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.707, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4qubWwLLJLO for <tools-development@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:02:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7000D3A6A51 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o8NG367c015341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:03:06 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.2 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-7--139581007"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C9B77D1.8010105@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:03:00 +0300
Message-Id: <4A098B36-6E33-46A9-9B02-242926DEC3F9@nokia.com>
References: <FE7BB2C0-FBC8-4E55-8F5C-2221B574A71A@nokia.com> <4C9B77D1.8010105@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (mail.fit.nokia.com); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 19:03:00 +0300 (EEST)
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "tools-development@ietf.org Development" <tools-development@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] "For Action"?
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-development>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 16:02:40 -0000
Ah! I guess I should know that by now... On 2010-9-23, at 18:52, Russ Housley wrote: > This happens is someone puts the document on the agenda but the state is > not IESG Evaluation. > > Russ > > On 9/23/2010 4:17 AM, Lars Eggert wrote: >> why is draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-01 listed under 2.1.3, and what is 2.1.3 in any case? Shouldn't it simply be under 2.1?
- [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] "For Action"? Lars Eggert
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] "For Action"? Russ Housley
- Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] "For Action"? Lars Eggert